In a wood-paneled dining room, with Picasso and de Kooning prints on the walls, Mr. Jones nervously presented a radical suggestion: the magazine, a leader of the revolution that helped take sex in America from furtive to ubiquitous, should stop publishing images of naked women.
Mr. Hefner, now 89, but still listed as editor in chief, agreed. As part of a redesign that will be unveiled next March, the print edition of Playboy will still feature women in provocative poses. But they will no longer be fully nude.
Its executives admit that Playboy has been overtaken by the changes it pioneered. “That battle has been fought and won,” said Scott Flanders, the company’s chief executive. “You’re now one click away from every sex act imaginable for free. And so it’s just passé at this juncture.”
For a generation of American men, reading Playboy was a cultural rite, an illicit thrill consumed by flashlight. Now every teenage boy has an Internet-connected phone instead. Pornographic magazines, even those as storied as Playboy, have lost their shock value, their commercial value and their cultural relevance.
le_nelson_mandela_face posted:i posted this thread primarily not because of porno, but because it's an amazing example of a bunch of shamblebro CEOs running a company into the ground because they've had 20 years to adapt to a change in the market and they have no fucking idea what they're doing. but CEOs are smarter than us and deserve to make ten thousand times what the guy in the print room does
A critique of capitalism hidden behind snickering about the follies of pornographers--Finally, some skillful misdirection that we all can get behind.
Edited by RedMaistre ()
Superabound posted:Business Consultant to Chrysler CEO: "Have you considered...NOT making cars??"
winkelvoss twins: have you considered opening up this harvard prank website to OTHER people?
Superabound posted:Business Consultant to Chrysler CEO: "Have you considered...NOT making cars??"
this is literally what ford did
