![](http://i.imgur.com/CD1TrSQ.jpg)
what has Science wrought
FAILAIDS posted:Agreed OP. I found this article very compelling, from our friends at http://www.dailystormer.com/hotwheels-why-i-support-eugenics/
If we had eugenics the founder of 8 chan wouldn't live a life of crippled embittered agony. That's a pretty good counterargument
also there's probably some argument to be made that every child should be as capable as possible to contribute and also to be happy and fulfilled, therefore, ...
![](http://media.rhizzone.net/forum/img/smilies/razz.gif)
c_man posted:i hope roseweird is having a better time doing whatever she's doing now
Going by the statistics, probably committed suicide.
While the romantic numskulls of Nazi Germany are dreaming of restoring the old race of Europe’s Dark Forest to its original purity, or rather its original filth, you Americans, after taking a firm grip on your economic machinery and your culture, will apply genuine scientific methods to the problem of eugenics. Within a century, out of your melting pot of races there will come a new breed of men – the first worthy of the name of Man.
One final prophecy: in the 3rd year of the Soviet rule in America you will no longer chew gum!
marimite posted:Eugenics as a means towards genocidal racism and eugenics as a means towards female separatism are two completely different things. In fact they're opposites: one restricts reproductive freedom while the other is a condition for it.
epic this
le_nelson_mandela_face posted:Another argument for eugenics: we could finally rid the world of the scourge of Portugal
Neo-Lustotropicalism will bury you, comrade.
le_nelson_mandela_face posted:we could finally rid the world of the scourge of Portugal
the European Central Bank?
Edited by RedMaistre ()
NoFreeWill posted:actually it's perfectly in keeping with high modernist socialist ideology. and Nieztshce is coal.
I follow the guiding star of Koba, and reliance on Schopenhauerian Irrationalist fossil fuel is the road to destruction.
Edited by RedMaistre ()
RedMaistre posted:Also, since when have you cared for remaining loyal to 'modernism', socialist or otherwise? Your sweeping ecological and social pessimism would seem to preclude that.
i'm anti-modernist, what I'm saying is that socialism is essentially a modernist project, during a period when technological optimism made sense and was shared by capitalists and socialists alike. and eugenics (technological control of reproduction) was one aspect of high modernism, so it's not surprising that people from both political camps were interested in it.
NoFreeWill posted:i can't imagine a utopian socialism that doesn't include eugenics, tbh.
Good riddance to utopia, then.
RedMaistre posted:The notion that life only has rights, not by reason of need, but by reason of merit and capacity, is a foundational principle of aristocracy and the negation of democracy in any meaningful sense of the word. Eugenics is this denial applied to the processes of social reproduction.
Counterpoint: Uncontrolled third-world reproduction rates are the literal grease that Global Capitalism relies upon to keep its gears from grinding to a halt