#1
[account deactivated]
#2
Mike Nelson here.
Post rating: +
Berlin 1936
Berlin 1945 after Soviet "liberation"
#3
[account deactivated]
#4
Post rating: ~
That's what happens to countries that don't use Rothschild phony money.
#5
Mike Nelson here.
Post rating: +
Discipline downvote... Damn. I should make clear I support this forum's Hobbesian-Burkean conservative principle that a bad dictator beats imperialist-championed chaos. Plus Islamists are way worse than Gaddafis theories, which at least paid lip service to socialism.
#6
Post rating: +

getfiscal posted:

Discipline downvote... Damn. I should make clear I support this forum's Hobbesian-Burkean conservative principle that a bad dictator beats imperialist-championed chaos. Plus Islamists are way worse than Gaddafis theories, which at least paid lip service to socialism.



Burke would not have approved of dictatorial usurpers with uniforms of territories that are the rightful property of legitimate royal dynasties and who possess insufficient regard for the currency of Anglophone countries.



#7
Post rating: +
In terms of notable British Politicians of the Late Georgian era, we follow the guiding star of Charles James Fox.
#8
[account deactivated]
#9
Online
Post rating: +
make redmaistre mod of lf
#10
Post rating: ~

ilmdge posted:

make redmaistre mod of lf


it would be nice to have more than one mod who actually still posts.

#11
[account deactivated]
#12
Post rating: +

tpaine posted:

redmaster seems to be, i don't know, i don't see the spark of humor in her eyes



I'm afraid that no part of me has, or deserves, the honor of being addressed as "her" anything.

#13
[account deactivated]
#14
Post rating: ~

tpaine posted:

ok, xier.



"His" is fine. my sex is not actually a secret.

#15
[account deactivated]
#16
Post rating: ~
*shrugs*....
#17
Kurdt
Post rating: ~
what have you done with redfiesta
#18
[account deactivated]
#19
[account deactivated]
#20
Post rating: +

gyrofry posted:

what have you done with redfiesta


#21
Post rating: ~

tpaine posted:

RedMaistre posted:

*shrugs*....



You always own the option of having no opinion. There is never any need to get worked up or to trouble your soul about things you can’t control. These things are not asking to be judged by you. Leave them alone

#22
[account deactivated]
#23
Post rating: ~
.

Edited by wasted ()

#24
Post rating: ~
make me a mod i am actually good mod
#25
Post rating: ~

RedMaistre posted:

getfiscal posted:

Discipline downvote... Damn. I should make clear I support this forum's Hobbesian-Burkean conservative principle that a bad dictator beats imperialist-championed chaos. Plus Islamists are way worse than Gaddafis theories, which at least paid lip service to socialism.

Burke would not have approved of dictatorial usurpers with uniforms of territories that are the rightful property of legitimate royal dynasties and who possess insufficient regard for the currency of Anglophone countries.



#26
the free-est
Post rating: +

#27
Post rating: ~
Near the end of the article they describes the connections of Daesh the so called Libya Dawn government in Tripoli, including the funneling of funds to group by the Central Bank of Libya...

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/29/world/middleeast/isis-grip-on-libyan-city-gives-it-a-fallback-option.html?_r=0

...which makes sense.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/421373/illegitimate-libyan-government-funding-terrorists-who-killed-chris-stevens-ann




#28
Post rating: +
Reminder that the Muslim Brotherhood dominated Turkish backed Tripoli government is considered by the United States a respectable political player that must be accommodated by the present internationally recognized government, while the Egyptian backed General Haftar, despite his role in the original regime change op, is a "spoiler", because of his hardline position on Islamists.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/in-libya-trying-to-make-one-government-out-of-two/2015/09/18/4c50627e-5d6b-11e5-9757-e49273f05f65_story.html

http://www.digitaljournal.com/news/politics/op-ed-neither-of-two-rival-regimes-sign-libya-political-agreement/article/450702

#29
hi
Post rating: ~
guess the honorable anti-imperialist position is, once again, to support the ex-CIA asset against the current CIA assets.
#30
Post rating: +
Or at least all this reminds us to keep an eye on the inter-comprador rivalries in MENA. Because there are real differences within that camp that are only going to get more prominent as the heat turns up on Saudi Arabia...


http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/1aa6c886-91d1-11e5-bd82-c1fb87bef7af.html
#31
Post rating: ~
ha...
http://www.cnn.com/videos/tv/2015/04/26/ctw-libyas-haftar-on-migrants.cnn

Well, better 4 years too late than never.
#32
Post rating: +

RedMaistre posted:

Near the end of the article they describes the connections of Daesh the so called Libya Dawn government in Tripoli, including the funneling of funds to group by the Central Bank of Libya...

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/29/world/middleeast/isis-grip-on-libyan-city-gives-it-a-fallback-option.html?_r=0

...which makes sense.
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/421373/illegitimate-libyan-government-funding-terrorists-who-killed-chris-stevens-ann






http://www.nationalreview.com/article/427669/obama-isis-strategy-failure

I love reading the conservative news. They're so close to reality but can't make the final step. So instead they blame the democrats. I find it much easier to talk to them about politics though since you just have to replace the word "imperialism" with "Obama's foreign policy", neo-liberalism with "Obama's domestic policy" and fascism with "Hillary Clinton future policy". Democrats on the other hand are just bourgeois liberals who simply refuse to see the world as reality instead of a football game where the point is to accumulate the most social capital.

#33
Post rating: ~
what about just callin a spade a spade?
#34
Post rating: ~

babyhueypnewton posted:

"imperialism" with "Obama's foreign policy", neo-liberalism with "Obama's domestic policy" and fascism with "Hillary Clinton future policy"


"zionism" with "the jews", "communism" with "fascism", "liberation" with "racial integrity",

Edited by c_man ()

#35
Post rating: ~

c_man posted:

babyhueypnewton posted:

"imperialism" with "Obama's foreign policy", neo-liberalism with "Obama's domestic policy" and fascism with "Hillary Clinton future policy"

"zionism" with "the jews", "communism" with "fascism", "liberation" with "racial integrity",




In bhpn's defense, there's a difference between the national review style conservativism he was talking about and stormfront.

#36
Post rating: ~
its the same as the difference between someone when they're dressed like a cop and when they're dressed like a klansman
#37
Post rating: ~
lol am i really being lectured about how there are "moderate reactionaries" who would become socialists if only we were to reach out to them appropriately?
#38
Post rating: ~
im sure baby newton's affinity for the right wing also has nothing to do with finding in them a sympathetic audience for his principled invective against gays and other sexual minorities
#39
Post rating: ~
i found one of baby newton's previous converts:
#40
Post rating: ~
I don't follow Are you trying to say that all the writers published at the national review (some of whom are jews, catholics, blacks, etc) are klans members or..?