#1
Mike Nelson here.
Post rating: +


The film 50 Shades of Grey contains depictions of controversial sexual relationships that might be considered rape. As you know, if you show something on a screen this means you endorse it. Therefore I'm calling on all of you to donate $50 to a shelter for women or endangered primates or whatever.
#2
Post rating: +
I haven't read the book yet so let's keep this spoiler free, thanks
#3
Post rating: ~
can someone post the fuck my ass batman picture i need it for a school project
#4
Post rating: +
Christian Grey, the main character, is written as a totally unrepentant psychopathic sexual predator that (AUTHOR SURROGATE) "must" fix/save because...Because and at no point throughout the text is the reader ever given any compelling reason to think that his particularly fixation with (AUTHOR SURROGATE) runs deeper than her happening to scratch his ingenue fetish itch.

Books like these probably do very real damage to a healthy realization of informed consent between those who want to finally approach and/or attempt the process of letting their partner know how aberrant and loathsome their carnal desires really are.

Edited by TheIneff ()

#5
Post rating: ~
Honestly, I see nothing wrong with this. There is no demand here that anyone step into ban the film,it is rather a demand to deny the film business your money.

No one has a obligation to see any movie, and certainly not a fantasy of erotized bourgeois wealth.
#6
Mike Nelson here.
Post rating: ~

RedMaistre posted:

There is no demand here that anyone step into ban the film

Actually some of the boring countries have already censored it. I know they don't count but still.

#7
Mike Nelson here.
Post rating: ~
Also I am boycotting this film, as I said in the original post, so yeah.
#8
Post rating: ~

TheIneff posted:

Books like these probably do very real damage to a healthy realization of informed consent between those who want to finally approach and/or attempt the process of letting their partner know how aberrant and loathsome their carnal desires really are.


Consent only matters when it's not with fictional Chad. Why would a woman think: I have the power to tell him to stop at any time when she's already with the man who is written to be her ideal in every way? The possibility of rape is nullified by all criteria for rejection being ruled out from the start.

#9
Post rating: ~
full disclosure: one of my youtube accounts is subscribed to sasha grey's boring-ass channel and i live in a dumpster next to a diaper.
#10
Post rating: ~

TheIneff posted:

and i live in a dumpster next to a diaper.



like, spiritually-wise

#11
Post rating: +

getfiscal posted:

RedMaistre posted:

There is no demand here that anyone step into ban the film

Actually some of the boring countries have already censored it. I know they don't count but still.



Good for them. But that's not what you offered for discussion in the OP. You were instead asking us to consider an idea put forward by a coalition of female victim advocacy organizations .

#12
Post rating: ~
Sorry if I am being tripped up by someone's 13 dimensional chess game of snark.
#13
[account deactivated]
#14
Mike Nelson here.
Post rating: +

RedMaistre posted:

Good for them. But that's not what you offered for discussion in the OP. You were instead asking us to consider an idea put forward by a coalition of female victim advocacy organizations .

I endorse their boycott. I'm not giving them money though obviously. I'm going to use my money to buy kindle books about Freudomarxism.

#15
Poronto
Post rating: +
i am going to end up watching this movie and paying money for it, non-consensually
#16
Post rating: ~
that makes sense because i vaguely remember twilight (only read the first one) not being as much of an interminable slog and his stalking doesn't necessarily warrant immediate placement within a publicly accessible separate registry. the community would be able to find that type of information through the standard online resources which double as a temporary kind of registry anyway. well, guess it depends on the state really.

Edited by TheIneff ()

#17
Post rating: +
im not going to give them money im going to buy 50 e-book copies of fuck and destroy
#18
Post rating: ~

getfiscal posted:

RedMaistre posted:

Good for them. But that's not what you offered for discussion in the OP. You were instead asking us to consider an idea put forward by a coalition of female victim advocacy organizations .

I endorse their boycott. I'm not giving them money though obviously. I'm going to use my money to buy kindle books about Freudomarxism.



Fair enough....Make sure you spend it on the good stuff though!

#19
Post rating: ~
Have you read theweleit? Very West German and burgerlich, but he does push Reich's line of thought to the point of undermining despite himself the romantic-libertarian notion of freedom which both sees fascism everywhere and finds itself continually creating the conditions for which fascism will be seen as the solution.
#20
Mike Nelson here.
Post rating: ~

RedMaistre posted:

Have you read theweleit? Very West German and burgerlich, but he does push Reich's line of thought to the point of undermining despite himself the romantic-libertarian notion of freedom which both sees fascism everywhere and finds itself continually creating the conditions for which fascism will be seen as the solution.

no, i haven't heard of him.

#21
Post rating: +
"All of the lines of scientific research based purely on ideological criticism, or ideologiekritik (headed by the Frankfurt School), and all of the theoretical approaches that practise historical-materialist-philosophical-metaphychological manipulations in an attempt to thrust Freud and Marx (or vice versa) onto a single pedestal - and finally create the homunculus, the omniscent one, from a retort - ignore the same basic area: the things that happen in, and to, human bodies (psychic matter). They have no category for the desiring-production of the unconscious, from which all reality, “psychic” as well as “social,” derives.

Ideologiekritik-based studies of paperbacks written for the “masses” show the same tendencies. They don’t give any thought to the thrills that run through the body of a woman reading a hospital romance; they merely find the errors in her thinking. (italics mine) Yet what the masses (all of us, that is) suffer most from are “false” feelings, feelings that are perverted, alienated from their goals, and turned into their opposites. The real problem isn’t that shopgirls have incorrect views about God and doctors. The real problem is that our bodies cramp up when they try to feel pleasure; sweat breaks out where love should; our soft, erect members become unsatisfied bones; our desire to penetrate another person’s body becomes a lethal act; and contact between two sets of skin, two bodies, produces tension, dirt, and death, instead of release, purification and rebirth."

— From Male Fantasies Klaus Theweleit

What is, on the one hand, humane, critical, and profound in his project and what, on the other hand, is risible (and masculinist) vitalist romanticism, is here summed up in one passage.
#22
Post rating: +
if one was cruel, you could note that while the second paragraph begins with the talk of the feelings of women, it ends by saying that the real problem is the other half's anxieties.
#23
[account deactivated]
#24
Post rating: ~
fyi i posted male fantasies here http://www.rhizzone.net/forum/post/256652/
#25
political car tune
Post rating: ~

conec posted:

edward cullen


who?

#26
political car tune
Post rating: ~

conec posted:

bella


who?

#27
Online
Post rating: ~

dipshit420 posted:

conec posted:

bella

who?

from beauty and the beast. emma roberts

#28
Post rating: ~
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gBRpjdMD77w
#29
Post rating: ~
http://www.lrb.co.uk/v34/n14/andrew-ohagan/travelling-southwards
#30
Post rating: +
im gonna post this again, here, because im still laughing about it

https://www.lifesitenews.com/static/even-the-co-stars-think-50-shades-of-grey-is-awful-rubbish-and-maybe-even-a.html