tpaine posted:if gavin likes it i will raead it also
oh my... shit... gavin posts here? oh my SHIT
blah is blee
liberty
Also I get a little curious about how MLs in Russia talked about how they needed to go through the bourgeois revolution (well that part doesnt confuse me) but wouldn't Sweden, Denmark etc fit the bill of a bourgeois revolution?
Or are those countries like too under the thumb of Amerikkka or first world thought and the historical development of their "social democracies" (I know little about the history of that region) come from anti-communist tendencies? The latter would seem a standard ML interpretation of those countries but I was wondering what most here thought since I get a little lost with "bourgeois revolution: good or bad?"
vv ok will read https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/lin-biao/1965/09/peoples_war/ch08.htm ty bae
Edited by Themselves ()
gyrofry posted:whats principal contradiction in the contemporary world preshus
No one knows
littlegreenpills posted:i dated a woman who was 35 years older than me for almost 3 years. it was a pretty bad decision in retrospect
damn thats hardbody af i dated a woman who was 15 years older than me for like 2 years and in retrospect i wish i was still w/ her i was just too young and immature to recognize true love and wanted to be a rowdy bike messenger and travel around the world getting drunk
chickeon posted:this thing samy boy wrote is crap! http://thenewinquiry.com/essays/all-the-wild-animals/
please don't criticize jihad sam kriss tor network, who is our friend and our hope.
Madness: A Brief History by Roy Porter
Snake Pits, Talking Cures and Magic Bullets by Deborah Kent
Masters of the Mind: Exploring the Story of Mental Illness from Ancient Times to the New Millennium by Theodore Millon
EmanuelaOrlandi posted:littlegreenpills posted:i dated a woman who was 35 years older than me for almost 3 years. it was a pretty bad decision in retrospect
damn thats hardbody af i dated a woman who was 15 years older than me for like 2 years and in retrospect i wish i was still w/ her i was just too young and immature to recognize true love and wanted to be a rowdy bike messenger and travel around the world getting drunk
i was too young and immature to recognize anything with sex and kissing was not necessarily true love and wanted to be a man literally no woman could ever complain about
laika posted:reading:
Madness: A Brief History by Roy Porter
Snake Pits, Talking Cures and Magic Bullets by Deborah Kent
Masters of the Mind: Exploring the Story of Mental Illness from Ancient Times to the New Millennium by Theodore Millon
you got any other recs for this type of stuff? or are you just getting started in it now
stegosaurus posted:you got any other recs for this type of stuff? or are you just getting started in it now
I'm mostly just getting started on it now. I'm starting with Roy Porter's book and it's pretty interesting, short, and accessible. It has some recommendations for further reading in the back based on what's covered in each chapter. Mad in America by Robert Whitaker and The Bitterest Pills by Joanna Moncrieff have a little bit of it, though they are mostly about other things.
It's all part of what I want to do with anthropology/sociology, so I'll probably have more in the future.
laika posted:stegosaurus posted:you got any other recs for this type of stuff? or are you just getting started in it now
I'm mostly just getting started on it now. I'm starting with Roy Porter's book and it's pretty interesting, short, and accessible. It has some recommendations for further reading in the back based on what's covered in each chapter. Mad in America by Robert Whitaker and The Bitterest Pills by Joanna Moncrieff have a little bit of it, though they are mostly about other things.
It's all part of what I want to do with anthropology/sociology, so I'll probably have more in the future.
you should check out origins of the sacred, it's a weird amalgamation of Lévi-Strauss, Nietzsche-as-philologist and physical anthropology. sort of like an freudian/quasiexistentialist evo-psych look at human spirituality? i found it very interesting
Edited by thirdplace ()
colonized against their colonizers, and that is the law of nations, which justifies
a sovereign people’s self-defense. The colonizer is due no more consideration
than would a foreign invader, for “Conquérir ou spolier avec violence, c’est
la même chose. Le spoliateur et l’homme violent sont toujours odieux” (4:
249). Scholars sometimes characterize Diderot’s appeals for colonized peoples
to revolt as calls for revolution, but this is not right. When one considers that
he was merely exhorting sovereign people to protect themselves from foreign
invaders, his appeals are remarkable not for being so radical, but for being so
thoroughly conventional. What is radical, however, is the equation of European
commerce with injustice and coercion. When doing business with an inhabited
country, Europeans who abrogate those people’s liberty or property can be
justly expelled or killed (8:105-108). Thus Diderot does not hesitate to call
on colonized peoples to resist. His speech to the Hottentots is particularly
rhetorical: the Europeans, “ravira l’innocence et la liberté. Ou, si vous vous
en sentez le courage, prenez vos haches, tendez vos arcs, faite plevoir sur ces
étrangers vos fleches empoisonnées. Puisse-t-il n’en rester aucun pour porter à
leurs concitoyens la nouvelle de leur desastre!” (2:240). These exhortations are
spread across the globe, whether it be in Africa (the Hottentots), Asia (India),
Oceana (the Tahitians), South America, or North America. "
From Denis Diderot On War and Peace: Nature and Morality by Whitney Mannies and John Christian Laursen
http://institucional.us.es/araucaria/nro32/ideas32_8.pdf
In 2012, on the 35th anniversary of the Wow! signal, Arecibo Observatory beamed a response from humanity, containing 10,000 Twitter messages, in the direction from which the signal originated.
Edited by Chthonic_Goat_666 ()
WildStalins posted:anyone know any good books on the 1980's war in afghanistan?
The Grand Chessboard by Zbigniew Brzezinski
tpaine plz fix this article
"We didn't bewail our lost fatherland, we kept a respectful silence towards it. Then sometimes, without any prior signal, we would start to sing old Army songs. We were all present and correct. But in reality we were all dead."
From a political angle, there was the notable disjunct between Roth's treatment of the violent suppression of the Austrian socialists by Dollfus with his treatment of the Anschluss. Of the former he comments, through the Polish aristocrat Chojniki, the closest thing to an authorial voice in the book:
"Dollfuss wants to kill the proletariat. God forgive him I really can't stand him. He is digging his own grave. The world has never seen the like...."
And then immediately thereafter, we are presented with a scene of Reisger, a Jewish cab driver known to the protagonist, mourning over the body of his son Ephraim, a communist party member. The father than prophecies against the government saying:
"The Cabinet Minister has shed blood and his blood, too, shall be shed. It shall flow like a rushing torrent."
(Which is indeed what historically happened)
This sympathy for the defeated left stands in sharp contrast to his depiction of the victorious fascists. When a local brownshirt, described as looking as he if he had come "from the toilets in the basement," disrupts an evening at the cafe to announce that a "German's People government" was now in power in Austria,the protagonist is provoked into the final sleepless night of despair that the novel ends with("Where can I go now, I, a Trotta?....). It is also here, not the description of the aftermath of the massacre of the Austrian Marxists, that a short spiel about the intrinsic incoherence of a people's government is inserted.
It is not actually surprising if you are already familiar with Roth, but it is interesting to see it in a work in which his leanings towards Rome and nostalgia for the Empire are particularly overt.
Edited by RedMaistre ()
WildStalins posted:anyone know any good books on the 1980's war in afghanistan?
http://www.afghanasamai.com/Dscutions-poleticalcullture/Afghanasamai-2012/BATTLESafghanistanTheBearTrapDefeatofaSuperpowerMohammedYousaf.pdf
i haven't read it yet (will soon) but it seems kind of important. the cowriter was involved in the us invasion of grenada which i've never even heard of till now but seems really interesting and horrible in turns
Edited by Bablu ()