Themselves posted:Who wants to give me a little help on why this perspective is wrong (or right I guess)? I get the feeling its Trot bullshit:
A: You're right that DotP isn't an idea that originated with Lenin, that's my point. Lenin simply put it into practice.
Trot Dude: Lol. Did he do that before or after dissolving the soviet councils and subsuming all their jurisdictions under his Sovnarkom government? Was it before or after he instituted the dictatorship of the one in production? The DotP is about the proletariat holding political power as a class and abolishing itself and class in general, not about their non-recallable representatives (such a petty bourgeois mindset) holding power in their stead and doing what they think is best. Marx makes fun of such nonsense both in his critique of mill and in the civil war in France . Now, you can say that Lenin had difficult conditions to juggle through, but that's a justification of the fact that he didn't institute (>Implying socialism, the conditions for the liberation of the proletariat can be instituted from the top and not from the proletariat themselves) either a form of socialism (the material base of that society was unchanged, and he and Bukharin knew and admitted to this) or of the DotP (the proletariat was relieved of the political power that it held briefly), not a rejection of that fact.
What are the topics I should educate myself on to have a better grasp on this stuff? Or this just Trot revisionism?
edit: I'll respond to my own post to show everybody how dumb I am. I didn't attend the Frankfurt school or anything so I'm probably not qualified to argue this, but my sense on this is that you can say Lenin did what you want to, it doesn't meant it wasn't also taking power away from the capitalist and bourgeois class and creating actually existing socialism.
Bukharin was a confessed traitor and Lenin died before the material base in Russia could be significantly affected. That was up to Stalin to do.
That's my analysis of this shite.
dont wanna dickwave i want to go learn about some of the claims made
You're not gonna convince that guy of anything, a misguided but radical person on the street can be potentially talked to while a liberal special snowflake waiting for the perfect socialism from the comfort of their first world computer chair is useless.
"maoism?"
"yes. first off, you're relying too much on bureaucracy and you have a clumsy technocratic view of socialism."
"oh you mean trotskyism."
"no! i mean that you need real worker's democracy based on councils of worker's and people's delegates if you want to avoid khrushchev revisionism."
"yeah that's trotskyism. guards, seize him!"
getfiscal posted:"stalin, my name is baby huey, i've come from the future to teach you about maoism."
"maoism?"
"yes. first off, you're relying too much on bureaucracy and you have a clumsy technocratic view of socialism."
"oh you mean trotskyism."
"no! i mean that you need real worker's democracy based on councils of worker's and people's delegates if you want to avoid khrushchev revisionism."
"yeah that's trotskyism. guards, seize him!"
material conditions beeyatch
peepaw posted:
the new jurassic world is lookin pretty good
babyhueypnewton posted:One of the best sources for this trot ironically is Trotsky's History of the Russian Revolution. Trotskyism is a mental illness and not a political position though and hasn't had anything to do with what Trotsky actually wrote since 1956.
Is that book worth reading?
WildStalins posted:babyhueypnewton posted:One of the best sources for this trot ironically is Trotsky's History of the Russian Revolution. Trotskyism is a mental illness and not a political position though and hasn't had anything to do with what Trotsky actually wrote since 1956.
Is that book worth reading?
Russ Brand is reading it at this very moment, I think enough has been said.
shriekingviolet posted:did you decapitate him en route, as is the canadian way?
damn
thanks for the recommendation bhpn i actually decided that I should check that out as well
soon full communism will be achieved in my synapses
Bablu posted:he'd visited cuba and venezuela apparently but didn't much care for them
what did he have to say about them
cuba he repudiated completely. said people there were entirely disillusioned about socialism, claimed there was no worker discipline, i.e. he saw construction workers fallen asleep midday in their bobcats. no consumer goods. the end of soviet funds immiserated the country etc. basically cbc-level criticism
venezuela he liked a bit more because in the part he visited he saw small producers and businesses were banding together in co-ops with an aim towards greater public welfare or something. he meant like small farmers and bakeries. he claimed chavismo couldn't last much longer but was a good experiment with visibly positive results
i don't read a lot about either country so also i didn't want to say anything that would lead to factionalist bickering cuz i had to sit next to him for forty eight hours
Edited by Bablu ()
my favorite scene (aside from when the protagonist shoots down common falsehoods about the soviet union) is when Tukhachevskii is dancing with a lady and asks her, "So, have you read Marx?"
Edited by Themselves ()
Bablu posted:last week i spent most of a busride from calgary to toronto talking to a trot (he was reading the revolution betrayed). we got along pretty ok and agreed on most things that needed doing as canadian communists. he'd visited cuba and venezuela apparently but didn't much care for them. i showed him steg's video and effortpost about cybersyn
time with friends is time well spent
A: why yes i believe it was these wicker chairs