Crow posted:.custom254229{}NoFreeWill posted:they certainly don't know their role in the "conspiracy"
Do I have to hold your hand on everything?
The article cites think tank experts and aid workers who appear befuddled by this seeming inconsistency: “I am alarmed that we are providing support for ISIS governance...By doing so we are indemnifying the militants by satisfying the core demands of local people, who could turn on ISIS if they got frustrated.”
hmm, maybe they actually are befuddled because they don't understand the situation, not just pretending to be??? it's consistent from certain peoples perspectives, but not to all individuals??
dank_xiaopeng posted:But The Wall Street Journal reports the United States was actually working very closely with Syrian Kurdish commanders in secret to defend Kobani.
lol what a scoop
NoFreeWill posted:Crow posted:.custom254229{}NoFreeWill posted:they certainly don't know their role in the "conspiracy"
Do I have to hold your hand on everything?
The article cites think tank experts and aid workers who appear befuddled by this seeming inconsistency: “I am alarmed that we are providing support for ISIS governance...By doing so we are indemnifying the militants by satisfying the core demands of local people, who could turn on ISIS if they got frustrated.”
hmm, maybe they actually are befuddled because they don't understand the situation, not just pretending to be??? it's consistent from certain peoples perspectives, but not to all individuals??
who gives a shit what they think. good job focusing on the least relevant aspect of it lol
NoFreeWill posted:humanitarian aid worker: I got into working for NGOs because I like to harm people, not because I drank the kool-aid and think I'm doing good.
British 19th century missionary: I got into working for the White Man's Burden because I like to harm people, not because I drank the kool-aid and think I'm doing good.
Crow posted:British 19th century missionary: I got into working for the White Man's Burden because I like to harm people, not because I drank the kool-aid and think I'm doing good.
please don't be anticlerical on this bulletin board
getfiscal posted:Crow posted:British 19th century missionary: I got into working for the White Man's Burden because I like to harm people, not because I drank the kool-aid and think I'm doing good.
please don't be anticlerical on this bulletin board
http://www.buzzfeed.com/victimsofcommunism/ten-super-disturbing-ways-communism-is-being-made-110h3
Crow posted:getfiscal posted:Crow posted:British 19th century missionary: I got into working for the White Man's Burden because I like to harm people, not because I drank the kool-aid and think I'm doing good.
please don't be anticlerical on this bulletin board
http://www.buzzfeed.com/victimsofcommunism/ten-super-disturbing-ways-communism-is-being-made-110h3
http://victimsofcommunism.org/mission/board-advisory-councils/
lol
aerdil posted:Crow posted:getfiscal posted:Crow posted:British 19th century missionary: I got into working for the White Man's Burden because I like to harm people, not because I drank the kool-aid and think I'm doing good.
please don't be anticlerical on this bulletin board
http://www.buzzfeed.com/victimsofcommunism/ten-super-disturbing-ways-communism-is-being-made-110h3
http://victimsofcommunism.org/mission/board-advisory-councils/
lol
This is basically a World Anti-Communist League reunion party
Crow posted:.custom254310{}NoFreeWill posted:.custom254260{color:#000000 !important; background-color:#E3E3E3 !important; }Crow posted:.custom254229{}NoFreeWill posted:they certainly don't know their role in the "conspiracy"
Do I have to hold your hand on everything?
The article cites think tank experts and aid workers who appear befuddled by this seeming inconsistency: “I am alarmed that we are providing support for ISIS governance...By doing so we are indemnifying the militants by satisfying the core demands of local people, who could turn on ISIS if they got frustrated.”
hmm, maybe they actually are befuddled because they don't understand the situation, not just pretending to be??? it's consistent from certain peoples perspectives, but not to all individuals??
who gives a shit what they think. good job focusing on the least relevant aspect of it lol
if you think your enemies are some grand conspiracy network that is omni-intelligent instead of an effective but loosely and confusingly coordinated imperialist machine that changes ur strategy.
NoFreeWill posted:if you think your enemies are some grand conspiracy network that is omni-intelligent instead of an effective but loosely and confusingly coordinated imperialist machine that changes ur strategy.
the enemy = the imperialist maschine = the KKKonspiracy
the cogs in the maschine are rarely cognizant of the bigger picture. the cool thing about neoliberalism is it has something to appeal to everyone. the 'bleeding heart' types can busy themselves with aid work and democracy forums, the 'hardliners' can support armed militias and bombing campaigns. the parameters of all these actions are set at a much higher level, and ensure that regardless of any lower-level group or individual intentions, the effect is aligned with the agenda of the maschine. if the agenda calls for destabilisation of a country/region through organised chaos and brutality, lo, even the humanitarian aid falls in line. i'm not sure why it should matter whether individual aid workers think they're doing a good thing. i'm not sure how that would require a change of strategy for anti-imperialists.
http://victimsofcommunism.org/mission/internships/
NoFreeWill posted:Crow posted:.custom254310{}NoFreeWill posted:.custom254260{color:#000000 !important; background-color:#E3E3E3 !important; }Crow posted:.custom254229{}NoFreeWill posted:they certainly don't know their role in the "conspiracy"
Do I have to hold your hand on everything?
The article cites think tank experts and aid workers who appear befuddled by this seeming inconsistency: “I am alarmed that we are providing support for ISIS governance...By doing so we are indemnifying the militants by satisfying the core demands of local people, who could turn on ISIS if they got frustrated.”
hmm, maybe they actually are befuddled because they don't understand the situation, not just pretending to be??? it's consistent from certain peoples perspectives, but not to all individuals??
who gives a shit what they think. good job focusing on the least relevant aspect of it lol
if you think your enemies are some grand conspiracy network that is omni-intelligent instead of an effective but loosely and confusingly coordinated imperialist machine that changes ur strategy.
Please tell me about strategy, guy who doesn't have a basic handle on any of the relevant knowledge
Gibbonstrength posted:hey crow lets say hypothetically I knew lots of vice news watching politically interested petit bourgeois people who I wanted to crash course in Imperialism what should I recommend them (or what should I read to explain the situation better)
animal farm.
Crow posted:.custom254369{}NoFreeWill posted:.custom254324{color:#000000 !important; background-color:#E3E3E3 !important; }Crow posted:.custom254310{}NoFreeWill posted:.custom254260{color:#000000 !important; background-color:#E3E3E3 !important; }Crow posted:.custom254229{}NoFreeWill posted:they certainly don't know their role in the "conspiracy"
Do I have to hold your hand on everything?
The article cites think tank experts and aid workers who appear befuddled by this seeming inconsistency: “I am alarmed that we are providing support for ISIS governance...By doing so we are indemnifying the militants by satisfying the core demands of local people, who could turn on ISIS if they got frustrated.”
hmm, maybe they actually are befuddled because they don't understand the situation, not just pretending to be??? it's consistent from certain peoples perspectives, but not to all individuals??
who gives a shit what they think. good job focusing on the least relevant aspect of it lol
if you think your enemies are some grand conspiracy network that is omni-intelligent instead of an effective but loosely and confusingly coordinated imperialist machine that changes ur strategy.
Please tell me about strategy, guy who doesn't have a basic handle on any of the relevant knowledge
hmm, my basic handle is that i read books. dunno about u?
Gibbonstrength posted:hey crow lets say hypothetically I knew lots of vice news watching politically interested petit bourgeois people who I wanted to crash course in Imperialism what should I recommend them (or what should I read to explain the situation better)
Crow posted:http://www.buzzfeed.com/victimsofcommunism/ten-super-disturbing-ways-communism-is-being-made-110h3
great ClickHole article
Gibbonstrength posted:hey crow lets say hypothetically I knew lots of vice news watching politically interested petit bourgeois people who I wanted to crash course in Imperialism what should I recommend them (or what should I read to explain the situation better)
hmmmmm Killing Hope by William Blum? Kill Anything That Moves by Nick Turse. basically anything in the Kill Series. Lenin's great but i dunno if i'd recommend that as an entry point to anyone but like proles and poor ppl (so the vast majority, lol). for pettys i think u might have to go the well-cited anti-imp histories that hit their morality register. Ka Ching! Dead babies! Hey! That's just, like, my opinion, man!
daddyholes posted:how so comrade
Brand appeal, so people don't immediately write you off as a conspiracy theorist.
my bookshelf.jpg
T. Frank
One Market Under God
What’s the Matter with Kansas
Zinn
The Zinn reader
The Twentieth Century
Marx Engels Reader
Chalmers Johnson, Blowback
W. Blum:
Killing Hope
Rogue States
N. Chomsky:
Necessary Illusions
Manufacturing Consent
Propaganda and the Public Mind
Imperial Ambitions
Deterring Democracy
Interventions
Chomsky on Miseducation
Failed states
Hegemony or Survival
Zizek
Sublime Object of Ideology
Philosophy shit
The Story of Philosophy
Oxford Companion to Philosophy
these are just my paper copies, i don't really participate in the meatspace economy any more than i have to
aerdil posted:also why people read chomsky as babby's first leftism despite his lack of any theoretical grounding
probably because he approvingly quotes marxist sources out of context
aerdil posted:also why people read chomsky as babby's first leftism despite his lack of any theoretical grounding
there's a lot of dorks who don't give a shit about theoretical grounding at least as first, I'd say the chomper is a good introduction to anti-imperialism for those sorts of people since he presents a general picture of how fucked up and evil american empire is in a way that you can't really argue or disagree with short of coming out in favour of fascism and genocide. also despite his stupid antileninism he manages to give the USSR a fairer shake than a lot of self proclaimed Marxists do. if you worry about having a sound ~theoretical grounding~ in trying to turn new people against capital/empire, there's a shitload of STEM dumbasses who'll just turn their brain off and get down with some fascist shit since it speaks to their sensibilities