RedKahina posted:RedKahina posted:
RedKahina posted:
Lessons posted:
If the choice is between the US and Assad, or the US and China, then the only option is to actually build a left alternative.
That is the lamest cliché; just babble effectively to veil your actual concrete choice which is to sustain the status quo: What you mean is you will give what cover you can to the US imperial aggression against Syrians, and you certainlly won't lift a finger to help the victims of US brutality and rapacity defend themselves: You're too busy °building your left alternative° to US power, like an alternative brand which I guess you mean to roll out when you're good and ready, to remember that "a left alternative" to US power must and would be constituted by its abiility to check US power. In other words the only way to build a "left alternative" to US power is by opposing US power. Instead, spending your time here ranting on about the moral turpitude of the government of (and Hizbullosevichly propaganda action figure of) the US' latest victim population, you're really marketing a kind of artifiicial left-flavored syrup to pour over US power.
Seriously are you building your left alternative in your basement and you'll bring it out when it's done? What is the act of "building a left alternative" to empire but the concrete relentless thwarting of imperial projects, the prevention of imperial violence, expansion, plunder?
You're blowing a lot of hot air about how I'm not doing enough for the cause of anti-imperialism but there really isn't anything people in the West can do to concretely support fighting the US militarily, Assad included. In the respect you're talking about it doesn't matter one bit whether we "support" or "oppose" Assad because it won't and can't affect the outcome of the Syrian conflict. Of course it's at least potentially possible for a US anti-imperialist movement to affect US policy but that's certainly not dependent on "supporting" Assad either.
And of course Assad isn't building a left, he's not a leftist, he's a rightist dictator who happens to be a US enemy at the moment
discipline posted:I thought you were told to stop using the word "dictator"
You are crazy people though
discipline posted:it always amuses me how people say "oh well there's nothing I can do to help" and don't even try. I'm speaking on an anti-imperialist panel at Left Forum and am involved with organizing an anti-imperialist group in New York. maybe it's not perfect but it's a start. I hope to demoralize the enemy at home, which I think is important.
you know that makes no difference whatsoever and it definitely doesnt make you or your arguments better than anyone else's come on now
discipline posted:I don't know, I think it does make a difference. you aren't just handed an opportunity in life to do something. organizing takes a lot of time, energy and effort. you have to start somewhere.
it does not make a difference
RedKahina posted:Lessons posted:
In any case of course the crimes of the US are worth opposing on a sort of moral/humanitarian basis, but what makes their opponents worth supporting, for me, rather than declaring a pox on both their houses, is that there's actual socialist or liberatory potential in that opposing project.
.
Shouting "a pox on both your houses" is not building a left alternative to anything.
discipline posted:it always amuses me how people say "oh well there's nothing I can do to help" and don't even try. I'm speaking on an anti-imperialist panel at Left Forum and am involved with organizing an anti-imperialist group in New York. maybe it's not perfect but it's a start. I hope to demoralize the enemy at home, which I think is important.
I'm not actively involved in anti-war stuff at the moment because literally nothing exists in my city and I'm unemployed, I used to be involved during the Iraq war in upstate NY and when I was in Greensboro.
Anyway thats not the point it's that American's stance on Assad's government is irrelevant to the outcome of the war no one here is "lifting a finger to help the victims of US brutality and rapacity defend themselves" in anything except the sense of 'moral support' unless they are sending money to Syria or going themselves
Edited by Lessons ()
RedKahina posted:RedKahina posted:Lessons posted:
In any case of course the crimes of the US are worth opposing on a sort of moral/humanitarian basis, but what makes their opponents worth supporting, for me, rather than declaring a pox on both their houses, is that there's actual socialist or liberatory potential in that opposing project.
.Shouting "a pox on both your houses" is not building a left alternative to anything.
This is an internet comedy forum I don't claim to be doing activism here
RedKahina posted:RedKahina posted:Lessons posted:
In any case of course the crimes of the US are worth opposing on a sort of moral/humanitarian basis, but what makes their opponents worth supporting, for me, rather than declaring a pox on both their houses, is that there's actual socialist or liberatory potential in that opposing project.
.Shouting "a pox on both your houses" is not building a left alternative to anything.
"Ni, ni" is the kind of thing the petty bourgoisie in the imperial core likes to say while in fact diligently reproducing the empire they claim not to support and tirelessly vilifying its victims and - as you have been doing here rather histrionically - viciously denouncing anyone who expresses the least sympathy for the targets of imperial terror torture plunder as complicit in all kinds of evils they and their empire they don't really support are simply obliged, or at least perfectly licensed and right, to chastize.
RedKahina posted:RedKahina posted:
RedKahina posted:
Lessons posted:
In any case of course the crimes of the US are worth opposing on a sort of moral/humanitarian basis, but what makes their opponents worth supporting, for me, rather than declaring a pox on both their houses, is that there's actual socialist or liberatory potential in that opposing project.
.
Shouting "a pox on both your houses" is not building a left alternative to anything.
"Ni, ni" is the kind of thing the petty bourgoisie in the imperial core likes to say while in fact diligently reproducing the empire they claim not to support and tirelessly vilifying its victims and - as you have been doing here rather histrionically - viciously denouncing anyone who expresses the least sympathy for the targets of imperial terror torture plunder as complicit in all kinds of evils they and their empire they don't really support are simply obliged, or at least perfectly licensed and right, to chastize.
Assad is not a victim or the target of terror torture and plunder, you continue to have a lot of self-righteous rhetoric and really nothing substantive to offer
discipline posted:Lessons posted:discipline posted:
it always amuses me how people say "oh well there's nothing I can do to help" and don't even try. I'm speaking on an anti-imperialist panel at Left Forum and am involved with organizing an anti-imperialist group in New York. maybe it's not perfect but it's a start. I hope to demoralize the enemy at home, which I think is important.
I'm not actively involved in anti-war stuff at the moment because literally nothing exists in my city and I'm unemployed, I used to be involved during the Iraq war in upstate NY and when I was in Greensboro.
Anyway thats not the point it's that American's stance on Assad's government is irrelevant to the outcome of the war no one here is "lifting a finger to help the victims of US brutality and rapacity defend themselves" in anything except the sense of 'moral support' unless they are sending money to Syria or going themselvesyou think moral support is useless? you can't even give them that - you discount their wishes, say it's impossible to know what they want - well, they keep fighting. the syrian army is made up of syrians. it's pointless to call Assad a dictator or even say we're talking about him. we're actually talking about a strong, populous social welfare state that is struggling to defend itself.
Well I guess you have a point, if it weren't a worthy cause surely no one would fight for it. You've got your finger on the Syrian people's pulse here.
RedKahina posted:RedKahina posted:
RedKahina posted:
Lessons posted:
In any case of course the crimes of the US are worth opposing on a sort of moral/humanitarian basis, but what makes their opponents worth supporting, for me, rather than declaring a pox on both their houses, is that there's actual socialist or liberatory potential in that opposing project.
.
Shouting "a pox on both your houses" is not building a left alternative to anything.
"Ni, ni" is the kind of thing the petty bourgoisie in the imperial core likes to say while in fact diligently reproducing the empire they claim not to support and tirelessly vilifying its victims and - as you have been doing here rather histrionically - viciously denouncing anyone who expresses the least sympathy for the targets of imperial terror torture plunder as complicit in all kinds of evils they and their empire they don't really support are simply obliged, or at least perfectly licensed and right, to chastize.
US paramilitary proxies in Syria kidnapped children to gas them for the cameras in a psyop to entertain and seduce the imperial core commentariat, upon whom the paras and their managers had to be able to rely to make the whole horrific project possible and worthwhile. If there weren't all these volunteer US pr people runnning around wailing about the evil Assad, such horrific sadistic operations would be pointless and the imperial paras wouldn't be carrying them out. You make this kind of aggression and these umimaginably barbaric crimes possible. The "Assadsbelosevich is no boyscout!": routine you and so many others are running is an indispensible component of the imperial terror.
Cut it out.
RedKahina posted:US paramilitary proxies in Syria kidnapped children to gas them for the cameras in a psyop to entertain and seduce the imperial core commentariat,
bahahahahahaha
discipline posted:it always amuses me how people say "oh well there's nothing I can do to help" and don't even try. I'm speaking on an anti-imperialist panel at Left Forum and am involved with organizing an anti-imperialist group in New York. maybe it's not perfect but it's a start. I hope to demoralize the enemy at home, which I think is important.
i post about it on the internet a bit
discipline posted:babyfinland posted:discipline posted:
I don't know, I think it does make a difference. you aren't just handed an opportunity in life to do something. organizing takes a lot of time, energy and effort. you have to start somewhere.
it does not make a differencewhatever you need to tell yourself
its ok to do things just bc they feel good
Lessons posted:That feel when the internet weirdo you were arguing with outs themselves as a complete lunatic
See there you go. You pretend you don't really support the UUS imperial aggressionn but you're a propagandist whose job is to go around shreikking about Milosassabollahsevic the monster and denying US terror torture death squads, foaming at the mouth with your zeal for every crude fable from Amanpour
RedKahina posted:Lessons posted:
That feel when the internet weirdo you were arguing with outs themselves as a complete lunatic
See there you go. You pretend you don't really support the UUS imperial aggressionn but you're a propagandist whose job is to go around shreikking about Milosassabollahsevic the monster and denying US terror torture death squads, foaming at the mouth with your zeal for every crude fable from Amanpour
At the mention of the US empire's crimes however well evidenced and routine, you have to errupt in cackles as if you had been given a post hypnotic suggestion.
discipline posted:it always amuses me how people say "oh well there's nothing I can do to help" and don't even try. I'm speaking on an anti-imperialist panel at Left Forum and am involved with organizing an anti-imperialist group in New York. maybe it's not perfect but it's a start. I hope to demoralize the enemy at home, which I think is important.
are you going to start at the forum by demanding that everyone publicly announce their support of the lion assad?
RedKahina posted:US is now since 1990 the rapacious empire carrying out the Nazi agenda to the letter
this is an insane thing to say
RedKahina posted:Lessons posted:
That feel when the internet weirdo you were arguing with outs themselves as a complete lunatic
See there you go. You pretend you don't really support the UUS imperial aggressionn but you're a propagandist whose job is to go around shreikking about Milosassabollahsevic the monster and denying US terror torture death squads, foaming at the mouth with your zeal for every crude fable from Amanpour
Oh shut up, your infowars crap does more to discredit anti-imperialism than all the anti-war activists admitting they don't like Saddam combined.
Lessons posted:RedKahina posted:
Lessons posted:
That feel when the internet weirdo you were arguing with outs themselves as a complete lunatic
See there you go. You pretend you don't really support the UUS imperial aggressionn but you're a propagandist whose job is to go around shreikking about Milosassabollahsevic the monster and denying US terror torture death squads, foaming at the mouth with your zeal for every crude fable from Amanpour
Oh shut up, your infowars crap does more to discredit anti-imperialism than all the anti-war activists admitting they don't like Saddam combined.
Cultural marxism is real and you are it.
Lessons posted:I exposed the CIA plot to kidnap and gas babies to my graduate seminar, not one of them even tried to dispute my flawless logic and superior ideology. Now tell me, "comrade", what have YOU done to fight imperialism lately?
You claim to be informed about Syria but plainly you are not reading any actual Syrian journalists. Try Sharmine Narwani. As for your quaint faith that the CIA and/or US contras would never hatch a plot to hurt anyone, certainly not children, you can read just about anything on any post WWII US proxy war eg http://www.amazon.com/Washingtons-War-Nicaragua-Holly-Sklar/dp/0896082954 or http://www.amazon.com/Degraded-Capability-Media-Kosovo-Crisis/dp/074531631X or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Cyclone or http://www.michelcollon.info/IMG/article_PDF/article_a3234.pdf or http://www.amazon.com/Rwanda-New-Scramble-Africa-Imperial/dp/1926824946 and on and on
RedKahina posted:Lessons posted:
I exposed the CIA plot to kidnap and gas babies to my graduate seminar, not one of them even tried to dispute my flawless logic and superior ideology. Now tell me, "comrade", what have YOU done to fight imperialism lately?
You do realize also when you descend to this - just a kind of sarcastic tic reaction where you hope the letters "CIA" alone wrapped in snark will make you sound wise and confident, as if you are aware of the real power of the empire and CNN supporting you, the signs of what Freud called repression are very obvious, like "oh right sure respectable gentlemen like Dora's father and his friends were molesting their daughters! rrrright!" followed soon by "you should be locked up and lobotomized for even suggesting such a thing about these fine citizens!" What you are repressing is not only the knowledge that the CIA as well as the US military and US contra paramilitaries do torture children to death but that the reason you want to deny it is cowardice, sadism and self interest.
RedKahina posted:RedKahina posted:Lessons posted:
I exposed the CIA plot to kidnap and gas babies to my graduate seminar, not one of them even tried to dispute my flawless logic and superior ideology. Now tell me, "comrade", what have YOU done to fight imperialism lately?You do realize also when you descend to this - just a kind of sarcastic tic reaction where you hope the letters "CIA" alone wrapped in snark will make you sound wise and confident, as if you are aware of the real power of the empire and CNN supporting you, the signs of what Freud called repression are very obvious, like "oh right sure respectable gentlemen like Dora's father and his friends were molesting their daughters! rrrright!" followed soon by "you should be locked up and lobotomized for even suggesting such a thing about these fine citizens!" What you are repressing is not only the knowledge that the CIA as well as the US military and US contra paramilitaries do torture children to death but that the reason you want to deny it is cowardice, sadism and self interest.
do you have any more reason to believe that the CIA kidnapped and gassed babies for the newsreels than that the boston bombing was a false flag attack designed to retarget american fears towards russia? i think it's more likely that the US media and state apparatuses simply capitalized on something that wasn't pre-planned, or worked to produce an environment in which bad shit is almost certainly going to happen. people talk about the iowa writer's workshop as a CIA project. that doesn't mean that the writers there had CIA handlers or even that they would necessarily have written anything differently from what they would have otherwise, but rather that it promoted a certain style and approach that was preferred. another example, the US is one of the major arms dealers in the world so they have a way of inserting themselves into groups that want weapons and never have to do anything themselves. is there a difference? i guess that depends on your priorities. does it make a difference whether or not the boston bombing was hatched in an FBI boardroom and then a stooge was found versus the story that you hear in the media? maybe not to you but i think it's an important difference to keep in mind.
discipline posted:c_man posted:this thread is 11 pages of people arguing because they agree on all issues except whether or not support of assad is definitely required
No it's not. And like I said, boiling it down to "I support/do not support Assad" is as pointless and meaningless as saying I support American imperialism when Obama is in power but not when Bush is in power.
what am i missing? it seemed like the main disagreement was whether or not saying "i think us imperialism is wrong but i also dont support assad" makes one an imperialist stooge
e: if this isn't it then what the hell is this argument about?
Edited by c_man ()