I wanna add the piketty book because of all the rush hate but 25 for a single book is too much, i'll request it from the library---any of you guys read it yet?
HenryKrinkle posted:
ugh
c_man posted:i'm shocked, shocked! to see inequality rising after destroying the labor movement and social services!
move over alan colmes
deadken posted:i'm reading the grundrisse
how are you finding that? have you read capital vol 1-3? im like a quarter through vol 2 >_<
Makeshift_Swahili posted:deadken posted:i'm reading the grundrisse
how are you finding that? have you read capital vol 1-3? im like a quarter through vol 2 >_<
only vol 1 w/ david harvey to hold my hand
deadken posted:preempting wittgenstein's private language argument
say words abt dis
HenryKrinkle posted:Dees
gyrofry posted:deadken posted:
preempting wittgenstein's private language argument
say words abt dis
deadken might have his own interpretation, but my sense is that the economists' Robinsonades run into the same problems Wittgenstein pointed out with following a rule in isolation. To follow a rule, a person has to grasp what a correct and incorrect application are. But an isolated individual lacks a way of telling whether he followed his own rule correctly because his only way of checking its correctness is appeal to his own private judgement: what feels right is right, and therefore nothing can really be right or wrong. Making up another rule to judge the first only pushes the problem further back as there's no better way to check the second than there was for the first. For there to be a rule to begin with, the application must be able to elicit a response from other people that establishes the standard for its correct use.
This poses a problem if you hold the view that individuals are innately commercially-minded, each one acting as if exchange value privately directed the use of their efforts before there was ever a society conditioned by generalized exchange value, before there was ever a public standard for rationally measuring one's efforts against another's. Economic Crusoe can't keep himself in line by nature -- his rule-governed activity is learned through public interaction with other people, and is for that reason historical.
"How could human behavior be described? Surely only by sketching the actions of a variety of humans, as they are all mixed up together. What determines our judgment, our concepts and reactions, is not what one man is doing now, an individual action, but the whole hurly-burly of human actions, the background against which we see any action."
LW, Zettel
pm me because i forget every post i make within 5 minutes
discipline posted:Kill Anything That Moves is a pretty intense book and made me cry a lot IRL
it is pretty intense. have you read any of the rest of this "American Empire Project" series? are any of them any good? I read one of the chomsky books a long time ago, hegemony and survival, and one of the other ones looks like a "bwuhhh those Republicans!!!" book, so I'm wondering what I'm getting into here with the other ones
conec posted:i hate when kindle edition costs more than paperback :stress:
i was taking a final yesterday and its open book (you're fucked if you have to actually look things up, you're just supposed to bring it because there are statistical tables in the back that you need), and i had to take it in the online testing center cos it was an online class, long story short, I had the book on my kobo and the proctor said "you can't use that thing" and then asked me if I could pull up the book from "wherever you bought it" and I said, well, you ever heard of library genesis? and he nodded and that was that.