littlegreenpills posted:that sounds depressingly straightforward
yeah it was great
thirdplace posted:i've been reading lf et al. for five or six years now and i'm still not positive that the people who claim to like anime aren't trolling me
My piddling genre distinctions
![](http://i.imgur.com/T3FXC9f.gif)
MindMaster posted:Stalin loved popular media, actually, and Trotsky was the one who brought a copy of Stendhal or whatever to every meeting.
in the west anime is not popular media. it's an awful niche affectation, its actual cultural worth entirely subsumed within its fetishistic value as a signifier of nerdy seperateness. there is no place for this under communism
https://soundcloud.com/shaliek/rappers-endorse-japanese
![](http://24.media.tumblr.com/38808848bdb266843cb2ead2a5b0e087/tumblr_mtaez1Z0H01qb86b1o2_1280.jpg)
deadken posted:MindMaster posted:Stalin loved popular media, actually, and Trotsky was the one who brought a copy of Stendhal or whatever to every meeting.
in the west anime is not popular media. it's an awful niche affectation, its actual cultural worth entirely subsumed within its fetishistic value as a signifier of nerdy seperateness. there is no place for this under communism
the same was probably true for cheap westerns in the soviet union. what's the point? you're describing it in a way that suggests the formal aspects of a cultural thing are tied to identity which are not really true outside of the context of the united states, which i have never even visited.
in a way it's exactly the appropriated part of how you manage to enjoy something that i think is usually likable.
MindMaster posted:and similarly, if you visit a mendelssohn concert in europe, or a noh play in tokyo, you will find that most of the audience consists of worthless snobs and disinterested rich people for whom the performance is just a prop to whatever pathetic identity they constructed for themselves (interestingly, this is less so for classical music performances in japan, from my experience). why not just throw all that shit out the window and appreciate something for what it is, for the way it relates to whatever the limitations of its own medium are, and accept or reject it based on that, instead of a broad and shallow perception which is ultimately rooted in identity? this is a simple argument but obviously true.
i think as regards the capilatist identity issues floatin around,
as i use conspicuous consumption to identify myself to others,
i categorize my own consumption patterns to define myself to myself, and the categories are given to me as genre
so "genre" itself is a form of mass manipulation
to expose similar people all to the same information and advertising
that is most effective to their type, as a social control