babyfinland posted:
lol the book is a defense of stalin to a great extent. we have come full trot now i think when we accuse a book like that of trotskyism
i was just forming an opinion based entirely on the title lol
deadken posted:babyfinland posted:
lol the book is a defense of stalin to a great extent. we have come full trot now i think when we accuse a book like that of trotskyismi was just forming an opinion based entirely on the title lol
its about the collapse of the soviet union lol. our weird trotskyite obsession is beginning to burrow into our skulls and getting all up in it, and diggin around
aerdil posted:
writing my own book atm.... teh rhizzone betrayed... babayfinland figures predominantly
i will not abide rape scenes
it is probably a good book but like Warning: They are members of the Obama Party
http://willamettereds.blogspot.com/2010/03/cpusa-national-board-criticizes-authors.html
deadken posted:
ehhh in the history of communism as Eternal Idea trotskyism is a p insignificant deviation, antirevisionists are right a lot of the time but theyre worrying about all the wrong shit
" . . . "
2. The letter ignores the context of our attendance, namely that the Canadian Communist Party, like other Communist Parties, invited us to speak on our book. The letter does not give the title of the book, SOCIALISM BETRAYED: BEHIND THE COLLAPSE OF THE SOVIET UNION, nor does it mention that International Publishers(IP)published the book in 2004 after the NB voted in favor of its publication over the objections of Sam Webb.
_________________________________________________________________/
Edited by aerdil ()
Saffer said that, although shed been to China before for a UN conference, this was the fist time she had ever had the chance to experience China. While much of the U.S. news media portrays China as a land of freewheeling capitalism and exploitation, Saffer said she was impressed by the countrys socialist construction.
You have to get out of the mindset that socialism looks a certain way, and that we know what it looks like, she said. In China, laws are made to support working people.
The CPC believes that China is in the primary stages of building socialism. When the Communist Party won state power in 1949, China had been ravaged by civil war and invasion. The early years after 1949 were marked both by periods of substantial economic and social progress, and by costly mistakes. During the “cultural revolution,” from 1966-1976, continuous political upheavals dealt a grievous setback to economic and social development.
The policies of reform and opening to the outside world that underlie China’s development today began in 1978, with the renewed leadership role of Deng Xiaoping. In practice, this means a thorough restructuring of the state owned sector aimed at bringing these industries up to world standards, and a planned opening of the economy to domestic and foreign private investment.
i fucking hate the CPUSA, waht a shell of its former self.. as far as i can tell its just filled with useful idiots and fbi informants atm
Edited by aerdil ()
china: large national planning organs, large state sector, mostly public ownership of the banking sector, state inspection and regulation of corporate sector, public ownership of land, ruling party officially committed to marxism and socialism, etc.
deadken posted:
ehhh in the history of communism as Eternal Idea trotskyism is a p insignificant deviation, antirevisionists are right a lot of the time but theyre worrying about all the wrong shit
Lin Biao:
in the end, the essence of revisionism is the fear of death
sounds like they're worrying about the right shit to me
getfiscal posted:
actually apparently keeran is ornery about the whole obama thing:
http://willamettereds.blogspot.com/2010/03/cpusa-national-board-criticizes-authors.html
lol
discipline posted:
If I offered you ten million dollars under the condition that you live as the other sex for the rest of your life, would you take me up on the offer?
Let's face it: if cissexuals didn't have subconscious sex, then sex reassignment would be far more common than it is. Women who wanted to succeed in the male-dominated business world would simply transition to male. Lesbians and gay men who were ashamed of their queerness would simply transition to the other sex. Gender studies grad students would transition for a few years to gather data for their theses. Actors playing transsexuals would go on hormones for a few months in order to make their portrayals more authentic. Criminals and spies would physically transition as a way of going undercover. And contestants on reality shows would be willing to change their sex in the hope of achieving fifteen minutes of fame.
is this seriously considered a feminist masterpiece because its absurd fairyland nonsense