Ironicwarcriminal posted:palafox posted:elektrenai posted:
redken I immediately thought of your 'reptilian alien awkwardly stuffed into human form' description when I saw this http://i.imgur.com/1UnjPZD.jpg
life: a user's manual-
a document rigorously constructed upon sometimes opaque internal mechanisms, often consisting of page upon page of itemised list or description of interior decoration, that manages to be personal and plaintive and funny and wry instead of just an exercise in formalism.
my missus just lent me this and it's pretty great: deeply intropective without being particularly neurotic, a very human book. Also she told me that Perec used to go hang out in all the trendy left-bank intellectual establishments but instead of schmoozing or boasting would play pinball for hours upon hours and i just think that's swell
yeah it's awesome. it's a disappointment to me that most of the other oulipo authors didn't go this route. not that I don't like them, I certainly do, but in the wake of "Life" or "w" i'm not going to rush to reread "impressions of africa" or anything. His biography also has tons of little anecdotes like that about him and they're mostly endearing. That said I'm not surprised that the thought of someone not being social rings your bell
palafox posted:Ironicwarcriminal posted:
palafox posted:
elektrenai posted:
redken I immediately thought of your 'reptilian alien awkwardly stuffed into human form' description when I saw this http://i.imgur.com/1UnjPZD.jpg
life: a user's manual-
a document rigorously constructed upon sometimes opaque internal mechanisms, often consisting of page upon page of itemised list or description of interior decoration, that manages to be personal and plaintive and funny and wry instead of just an exercise in formalism.
my missus just lent me this and it's pretty great: deeply intropective without being particularly neurotic, a very human book. Also she told me that Perec used to go hang out in all the trendy left-bank intellectual establishments but instead of schmoozing or boasting would play pinball for hours upon hours and i just think that's swell
yeah it's awesome. it's a disappointment to me that most of the other oulipo authors didn't go this route. not that I don't like them, I certainly do, but in the wake of "Life" or "w" i'm not going to rush to reread "impressions of africa" or anything. His biography also has tons of little anecdotes like that about him and they're mostly endearing. That said I'm not surprised that the thought of someone not being social rings your bell
point taken but can you think of any great works of literature that are written by people who are socially open, at ease and draw pleasure from it?
deadken posted:i know a girl who's very into bdsm stuff & hates the book because it misses out a lot of important stuff (no safewords etc) + presents kinky sex as a symptom of childhood abuse you need to overcome if you're every going to be happily married + mostly i think because a bunch of frumpy housewives are muscling into her cool fetish
that's true, i can definitely see myself physically oppressed by a bunch of frumpy muscular fetish housewives
deadken posted:i know a girl who's very into bdsm stuff & hates the book because it misses out a lot of important stuff (no safewords etc)
well maybe it's the books lack of such prudish victorian sensibilites that makes it so endearing
there's a reason those mills and boons novels aren't like 'he tore off her bodice and gazed upon her breasts with unabashed lush...
'now' he whispered into her ear...'now....let's negotiate consent and establish a safeword'
deadken posted:fuck and destroy by john christy
no joke but the critique of bdsm in this is great
Ironicwarcriminal posted:deadken posted:fuck and destroy by john christy
no joke but the critique of bdsm in this is great
lol what critique
Ironicwarcriminal posted:deadken posted:i know a girl who's very into bdsm stuff & hates the book because it misses out a lot of important stuff (no safewords etc)
well maybe it's the books lack of such prudish victorian sensibilites that makes it so endearing
there's a reason those mills and boons novels aren't like 'he tore off her bodice and gazed upon her breasts with unabashed lush...
'now' he whispered into her ear...'now....let's negotiate consent and establish a safeword'
sure Except in the book the dude literally has her sign a contract in which she assents to the use of nipple clamps and electric shocks delivered to the anus and so on, so not establishing a safeword is a pretty glaring omission
littlegreenpills posted:Ironicwarcriminal posted:
deadken posted:
fuck and destroy by john christy
no joke but the critique of bdsm in this is great
lol what critique
'all this gimmickry and equipment is a crutch for emotionally broken, alienated and often narcissistic nerds. it is substituting technology for intimacy and also lots of nerds here'
Ironicwarcriminal posted:littlegreenpills posted:Ironicwarcriminal posted:
deadken posted:
fuck and destroy by john christy
no joke but the critique of bdsm in this is great
lol what critique'all this gimmickry and equipment is a crutch for emotionally broken, alienated and often narcissistic nerds. it is substituting technology for intimacy and also lots of nerds here'
"i'm at mcdonalds bro, there sure are a lot of fat people here" - A Critique
deadken posted:i read 50 shades cover to cover lol. it is, of course, terrible
go write an article about how it's actually really really good for abstruse deleuzean reasons
deadken posted:Ironicwarcriminal posted:deadken posted:i know a girl who's very into bdsm stuff & hates the book because it misses out a lot of important stuff (no safewords etc)
well maybe it's the books lack of such prudish victorian sensibilites that makes it so endearing
there's a reason those mills and boons novels aren't like 'he tore off her bodice and gazed upon her breasts with unabashed lush...
'now' he whispered into her ear...'now....let's negotiate consent and establish a safeword'sure Except in the book the dude literally has her sign a contract in which she assents to the use of nipple clamps and electric shocks delivered to the anus and so on, so not establishing a safeword is a pretty glaring omission
Well I do think erotica should have some aspect of believability, I'm going to ask Lykorgouros to borrow his WestLaw password to see if such a contract would be legally binding.
roseweird posted:the past 2 pages of this thread mademe wwant to vomit
well a forum for depressed addicts and nihilists can't be perfect.
deadken posted:nah i like deleuze but heraclitus is more important
more important how? i admittedly dont know a lot about why people care about Hera "Big Clit" Clitus, so im actually curious about what role he plays today
Bataille posted:Without a profound complicity with natural forces such as violent death, gushing blood, sudden catastrophes and the horrible cries of pain that accompany them, terrifying ruptures of what had seemed to be immutable, the fall into stinking filth of what had been elevated — without a sadistic understanding of an incontestably thundering and torrential nature, there could be no revolutionaries, there could only be a revolting utopian sentimentality.
c_man posted:deadken posted:nah i like deleuze but heraclitus is more important
more important how? i admittedly dont know a lot about why people care about Hera "Big Clit" Clitus, so im actually curious about what role he plays today
iirc hegel said there wasn't a line in his philosophy that wasn't already contained in heraclitus
deadken posted:i know a girl who's very into bdsm stuff & hates the book because it misses out a lot of important stuff (no safewords etc) + presents kinky sex as a symptom of childhood abuse you need to overcome if you're every going to be happily married + mostly i think because a bunch of frumpy housewives are muscling into her cool fetish
is this laurie penny lol
deadken posted:iirc hegel said there wasn't a line in his philosophy that wasn't already contained in heraclitus
i can kinda see that (the whole unity of opposites thing i guess?) but isnt that a really strange thing to say about a philosopher whose work we have only vague fragments of?
its not hip to say here i think but i still think zizek is a groundbreaking philosopher
also im reading The Right To Be Lazy by Lafargue