No one can guard rights, except a government under objective laws. What if McGovern had his gang of policemen, and Nixon had his, and instead of campaigning they fought in the streets? This has happened throughout history. Rational men are not afraid of government. In a proper society, a rational man doesn’t have to know the government exists, because the laws are clear and he never breaks them.

ghfghfgh posted:

Justification #1: Welfare increases poverty

http://johnrlott.blogspot.com/2012/05/austerity-and-economic-growth.html

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-yppRZ853g5w/T76gL57g23I/AAAAAAAACns/aqpN5jpwUuo/s1600/Government%2BAusterity%2Band%2BPercent%2Bof%2BWorking%2BAge%2BPopulation%2BWorking.jpeg

Justification #2: Ayn Rand supports government; leftists must reflexively disagree

http://www.aynrand.org/site/PageServer?pagename=ar_libertarianism_qa

No one can guard rights, except a government under objective laws. What if McGovern had his gang of policemen, and Nixon had his, and instead of campaigning they fought in the streets? This has happened throughout history. Rational men are not afraid of government. In a proper society, a rational man doesn’t have to know the government exists, because the laws are clear and he never breaks them.

forgibe me if im wrong (i have dyscalculia and failAIDS) but doesnt this graph simply show that the strong public investment in infrastructure native to european socialism is good for the economy while Irelands extremely low corporate tax rates and high blood alcohol levels are literally destroying mick employment