roseweird posted:i liked d&d games for a while because i liked how you had a little imaginary person with a sword made out of numbers and you can calculate probabilities and use magic!, not because i think roleplaying games have good stories. i read most of the book and thought "this reads like a d&d campaign" then i read an interview and found out he takes inspiration from d&d, which is a dumb way to write, imo. i don't know how the book ends, but i assumed it would end with an epic boss battle that i didn't really need to read so i returned it to the library. if you prefer my opinion as a self-realized nerd i'd still say "waste of time, just go play temple of elemental evil or something instead". just saying if you enjoy china mieville you might also enjoy world of warcraft novels. i still think crawl and anime are cool so if you can forgive my genocidal urges i hope we can be friends~
You're not complaining about actual problems with the book though, you're complaining that it reminds you of Dungeons and Dragons and telling me that makes it bad which isn't a real criticism. It's like people that complain that it's steampunk and they don't like steampunk because they saw pictures of nerds dressed up in Victorian dresses wearing steampunk monocles, its just a self-conscious obsession with subcultural symbols that you reflective blanch at rather than using your brain to figure things out. In other words stop being a hipster for 5 seconds and maybe you can enjoy things.
Lessons posted:. . . a self-conscious obsession with subcultural symbols . . . . stop being a hipster . . . . .
Lessons posted:Stop being retards
stop attacking a forum you secretly love... we're your friends... your best friends.
mieville takes that as a starting place and subverts it with his trottiness and as a liberal I enjoyed it, but I was really hesitant at first for the same reasons as rw just from reading the wiki page, knowing nothing about any literal dnd link
- thuglessons before his dad walked out on him
Lessons posted:You're not complaining about actual problems with the book though, you're complaining that it reminds you of Dungeons and Dragons and telling me that makes it bad which isn't a real criticism. It's like people that complain that it's steampunk and they don't like steampunk because they saw pictures of nerds dressed up in Victorian dresses wearing steampunk monocles, its just a self-conscious obsession with subcultural symbols that you reflective blanch at rather than using your brain to figure things out. In other words stop being a hipster for 5 seconds and maybe you can enjoy things.
roseweird is actually doing the exact opposite of this. she's not complaining it has some superficial D&D tropes and therefore sucks because she doesn't want to be associated with nerds, she's saying it sucks because it uses a narrative style based in D&D which by definition doesn't make for good fiction. I don't know if she's actually right about that book cuz I haven't read it but her evaluation if true is entirely valid. it's like saying a movie looks like and has the plot of a first person shooter or something, that's not going to make for a good movie (if only because of the lack of interactivity means that the flaws of the other forms can't be forgiven anymore).
i don't know or care if china mieville or anyone is a trot though.
acephalousuniverse posted:Lessons posted:You're not complaining about actual problems with the book though, you're complaining that it reminds you of Dungeons and Dragons and telling me that makes it bad which isn't a real criticism. It's like people that complain that it's steampunk and they don't like steampunk because they saw pictures of nerds dressed up in Victorian dresses wearing steampunk monocles, its just a self-conscious obsession with subcultural symbols that you reflective blanch at rather than using your brain to figure things out. In other words stop being a hipster for 5 seconds and maybe you can enjoy things.
roseweird is actually doing the exact opposite of this. she's not complaining it has some superficial D&D tropes and therefore sucks because she doesn't want to be associated with nerds, she's saying it sucks because it uses a narrative style based in D&D which by definition doesn't make for good fiction. I don't know if she's actually right about that book cuz I haven't read it but her evaluation if true is entirely valid. it's like saying a movie looks like and has the plot of a first person shooter or something, that's not going to make for a good movie (if only because of the lack of interactivity means that the flaws of the other forms can't be forgiven anymore).
i don't know or care if china mieville or anyone is a trot though.
If you look at what she's actually complaining about it's insanely petty shit like "these are fantasy species trying to be scifi species" and you would have to be a retard to think the book is a novelized D&D game.
here's a good article about PKD by Mark Fisher anyhow
http://k-punk.abstractdynamics.org/archives/008427.html
roseweird what'd you think of the scanner darkly movie
Crow posted:Lets kill nick land
Les kill nick land dudes
discipline posted:also dick isn't that great with women. they're either his depressed and/or estranged wife or young and wiley, sexually alluring and out to get him
thats because his very first experience as a child was watching helplessly as his twin sister was cruelly murdered by his mothers criminal womb