I'll keep a running tally of all donations posted in this thread:
getfiscal - Canadian - ineligible
littlegreenpills - Briton - ineligible
Lykourgos - Briton - ineligible
jools - Briton - ineligible
mccaine - Dutch - ineligible
future widow - canadian - ineligible
maggotmaster - chilean - ineligible
bippy - $100.01 to Biden 2016
goldenliontamarin - $69 to weird twitter pac
goatstein - $2500 to hillary clinton exploratory committee
discipline - $100 to Biden 2016
stegosaurus posted:the socialist alternative candidate is literally hitler
/
the "loss of china" as it turned right pretty much guaranteed failure for the new communist movement as it was structured, along with the end of the vietnam war (and later the destruction of black urban life in america), which traded heavily on prestige of mao and often invested in concepts like three worlds theory which were then abandoned. the two lines also sort of failed doubly over - they couldn't build a line that seemed relevant and they found working with workers incredibly difficult. that doesn't mean they didn't try. it was common for communists to "industrialize" or "establish" themselves and take factory jobs and such in order to organize, but the fact is they weren't pleasant jobs and people either built families or otherwise drifted away from communism.
i don't really buy mao's advancements any more than ho chi minh's or kim il-sung's or castro's or che's or a lot of the other roads that developed in anticolonial revolutionary states. the other thing i agree with is the criticism of the soviet union as turning right, and i'm not entirely sure what to make of that. i don't buy people's war or new democracy or whatever. i think the prevailing theory of the state in the early 1950s or so made sense (people's democracy) but i don't really know if it built substantial socialist democracy. like the various shifts to the right that happened in every country led by communists seems to prove that something was up. but i don't know how you can rectify that without getting people to agree on the basics. but like the number of people who agree with that basic picture is basically zero because it's like... critical hoxhaism or something? which suggests to me it might be incoherent but i dunno..
Edited by Lykourgos ()
Lykourgos posted:hey I'm eligible; I wasn't born in the States but I am a US citizen who has had citizenship ~from birth~. Find me the case law that says you have to actually be born in the geographic united states, rather than be a natural born us citizen.
There isn't that's why we fucking argue about it every goddamn election
libelous_slander posted:Lykourgos posted:hey I'm eligible; I wasn't born in the States but I am a US citizen who has had citizenship ~from birth~. Find me the case law that says you have to actually be born in the geographic united states, rather than be a natural born us citizen.
There isn't that's why we fucking argue about it every goddamn election
Right, so get ready for your first foreign born, foreign citizenship holding president, fuckers
Lykourgos posted:I don't see anything in the constitution about that. The only question left is, do I run as a Republican or as a Democrat?
im not sure you'd make it through either primary with foreign citizenship as it presents a conflict of interest (just like pizza)
gyrofry posted:grumblefish who is ur fave supreme court justice of the last 40 years
i am also interested
TG posted:lokyrgyz seems like a scalia man, but thats probably too obvious. maybe rehnquist?
If I have to choose some modern Justice then yes, you win, I would probably choose Rehnquist. Although when Scalia says something Catholic that falls close to Plato, like when he said the thing about encouraging confessions, I kind of smile. That smile is outweighed by how little I think of everything else he and his fellow Justices say.
It's not really a choice I care to make, though. I don't agree with the US Supreme Court's interpretation of the federal constitution, and fundamentally speaking I'm not particularly fond of the constitution either way.
Lykourgos posted:fundamentally speaking I'm not particularly fond of the constitution either way.
much like our current president.... you'll fit right in.
getfiscal posted:even i'm not an american.... jesus dude
agreed; all americans by birth please kill yourselves tia
Superabound posted:Jesse "The Body Politic" Ventura. Two-thousand sixteen
Edited by postposting ()