roseweird posted:Ironicwarcriminal posted:
thirdplace posted:
you don't cure psychological trauma by pretending its symptoms are virtues
tell that to the gay lobby heyyoooo
be ashamed of yourself
i bear no hate roseweird, just a lust for low hanging lols
acephalousuniverse posted:
lol
roseweird posted:not laughing. but do what you like
nah i'm just joshing, the gays are orright
It is intellectuals and Trotskyists who compare practices with ideas to see how good or bad the practice is. With this comparison, for example, it is easy to shoot down the practice of Stalinism with the ideas of Trotskyism or the ideas of Madison and Jefferson or any idea for that matter. This method is not wrong because it is Trotskyist or Madisonian. Rather, Trotskyism is wrong because it uses this idealist method to criticize Stalinism instead of comparing Trotskyist practice with Stalinist practice.
In the same vein, it's not fair to compare Maoism with Jesus Christ in the abstract. Maybe Mao did not obey the 10 Commandments. But his followers have a better practice than the Christians when it comes to ending oppression.
The only time it is correct to evaluate a practice in relationship to an idea is within that practice. Maoists can determine if there are better ways to be Maoists and tap existing potential by discussing ideas within Maoism. Even then, the only proof of the validity of a new Maoist idea is by comparing one Maoist practice with another Maoist practice.
Hence MIM uses the "where's the beef" taunt to everyone else. There are an infinity of logically consistent ideas ranging from professors' pet economic models to Hare Krishna. Only some ideas, however, have come with practices to end oppression. By choosing the ideology that goes with the most historically effective practice of social change to end oppression, one separates oneself from dogmatism and religion. Dogmatism may take the form of believing in reform no matter what; it may take the form of opposing dogma all the time, but in every case dogmatism and religion really amount to comparing apples and oranges, the apples being ideas and the oranges, practices. Dogmatists of all stripes conclude that oranges should be more like apples. In contrast, Marxist materialists just pick the best oranges.
getfiscal posted:
*specializes in oral, anal, DP, DA, DVDA, McDLT
SariBari posted:what do you have to teach first world women about morality?
it's hilarious how much you all hate your mothers and sisters. i bet half of you still depend on them in some way too. do me a favor this holiday season, don't get them shit. take them to soup kitchens or walk 10 paces behind them in a part of town where they have no right to be. listen to these men and boys say they want inside of your relative's cunt. that should erase a generation or so of white guilt for the fam. also, be sure to tell all of the women who actually "belong" there that you're sorry for the much worse harassment they have to endure and you wish your whore mothers could take their medicine for them.
i dont know where you live, but luckily around here weve had a few extra decades of Jim Crow to teach the lowly fieldhand how to properly address his white superiors
babyhueypnewton posted:we have liberal feminists who believe they are better than actual socialist organizations because they don't care enough about trans whatever. we have splits over not which organizational form is best for revolution but over "slut-shaming" or "progressive stack". we have people who do not care about security culture or FBI disinformation because certain moral transgressions are unacceptable and need to be "called out".
babyhueypnewton posted:Real communists are not in the business of virtue, they are in the business of violence (in a Nietzschean sense). They create their own virtue. People condemn the black panthers sexism because they lost. The modern left goes on about identity because it has no power and therefore does not have to impose itself on others
i'm not trying to talk about virtue. I agree with you that the culture of calling out, insofar as it takes weak people and labels them Bad with a Capital B, is counterproductive. but instead of excusing the activities that prompt that labeling, letting them go unchecked within their communities, rippling out and richocheting in and grow ever more intensely within that community, i say: examine them.
because a good healthy man does not catcall, he does not rape, he does not hate his mother. if we reject the moral judgment, then the only thing that's left is health and imo that's the most accurate angle anyway. if you break up families via slavery, sap people's dignity via prejudice, stuff entire communities into rape cages, and cook the whole broth with the stress of living under capitalist oppression, you're gonna cook up some nasty psychosocial trauma. now you could ignore that trauma and just work to defeat the things that created it; as a middle class white man, that is probably the closest thing to an appropriate role i have. but i really don't think that, alone, is enough, because trauma begets trauma. the poison will not just pass through, but fester and compound.
and really, i don't think you'll ever get your Full Blown Socialism if you don't fix those wounds. i don't know a tenth of the history i'd need to be able to say this definitively, but I strongly suspect it: a guy who clutches what little he has, which includes a patriarchal masculinity, is not a guy who is ready to give up capitalist assumptions of property, not a guy who is interested in working to improve his community and express his creative instincts rather than out of compulsion. is it an accident that socialism was most active and most successful when it could draw generously from groups raised in stable and relatively healthy agrarian communities rather than peoples two or three generations deep into malign industrial alienation?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jOmfUFvf3Nk
c_man posted:i do think its shitty that we apparently live in a world where a rich women getting called a name is a worse problem than the exploitation of the underclasses
surely this is a problem that affects working class women more than rich women.
c_man posted:i do think its shitty that we apparently live in a world where a rich women getting called a name is a worse problem than the exploitation of the underclasses
To who? To rich people? Yall are worthless
Ironicwarcriminal posted:c_man posted:i do think its shitty that we apparently live in a world where a rich women getting called a name is a worse problem than the exploitation of the underclasses
surely this is a problem that affects working class women more than rich women.
One in three American Indian women have been raped or have experienced an attempted rape, according to the Justice Department. Their rate of sexual assault is more than twice the national average.
Ironicwarcriminal posted:surely this is a problem that affects working class women more than rich women.
sounds like a class problem then? maybe economic vulnerability leads to increased vulnerability to identity-based prejudices?
c_man posted:Ironicwarcriminal posted:
surely this is a problem that affects working class women more than rich women.
sounds like a class problem then? maybe economic vulnerability leads to increased vulnerability to identity-based prejudices?
what identity based prejudices are you referring to?
Edited by c_man ()
Ironicwarcriminal posted:what identity based prejudices are you referring to?
i was thinking in general terms but i guess i was just thinking that economically vulnerable women are made more vulnerable to sexism which i guess is really obvious and i probably didnt need to say anything
Crow posted:Ironicwarcriminal posted:c_man posted:i do think its shitty that we apparently live in a world where a rich women getting called a name is a worse problem than the exploitation of the underclasses
surely this is a problem that affects working class women more than rich women.
One in three American Indian women have been raped or have experienced an attempted rape, according to the Justice Department. Their rate of sexual assault is more than twice the national average.
i was at a conference recently where a lady talked about going to a meeting at an inuit village, where an inuit lady said "every woman in this room has been raped. no one believes me when i say it, but it is true," then turns to the room and says "raise your hand if you've been raped," & every hand goes up
thirdplace posted:because a good healthy man does not catcall, he does not rape, he does not hate his mother. if we reject the moral judgment, then the only thing that's left is health and imo that's the most accurate angle anyway.
thats actually the single most significant factor here, and its gone completely unsaid: the vast majority of catcalling homeless people are most likely suffering from severe and completely untreated mental illness. most rationally capable homeless people tend to not insult those who have money they might give to them, and stay out of trouble so that theyre not indiscriminately murdered by the cops doing everything they can to keep our precious city streets safe for Capital
Superabound posted:thirdplace posted:because a good healthy man does not catcall, he does not rape, he does not hate his mother. if we reject the moral judgment, then the only thing that's left is health and imo that's the most accurate angle anyway.
thats actually the single most significant factor here, and its gone completely unsaid: the vast majority of catcalling homeless people are most likely suffering from severe and completely untreated mental illness. most rationally capable homeless people tend to not insult those who have money they might give to them, and stay out of trouble so that theyre not indiscriminately murdered by the cops doing everything they can to keep our precious city streets safe for Capital
Homeless people arent the ones catcalling, you ingrates. You worthless filth need a job
Crow posted:One in three American Indian women have been raped or have experienced an attempted rape, according to the Justice Department. Their rate of sexual assault is more than twice the national average.
clearly the uncouth Red Barbarian has not been sufficiently punished and chastised by US government agents at the behest of the white savior. im sure it has nothing at all to do with having your entire culture destroyed and surviving one of the worlds most brutal genocides only to be forced into ghettos and raised by multiple successive generations of genetic alcoholism recently activated by White Man's Poison
the lack of proper quarantine measures in the wake capitalist bloodletting is still the #1 cause of teh spread of failAIDS
Superabound posted:Crow posted:One in three American Indian women have been raped or have experienced an attempted rape, according to the Justice Department. Their rate of sexual assault is more than twice the national average.
clearly the uncouth Red Barbarian has not been sufficiently punished and chastised by US government agents at the behest of the white savior. im sure it has nothing at all to do with having your entire culture destroyed and surviving one of the worlds most brutal genocides only to be forced into ghettos and raised by multiple successive generations of genetic alcoholism recently activated by White Man's Poison
{pushes you out of the way without reading} They need to way instain red women to brigade so they can frigth back
getfiscal posted:
What's the porn equivalent of the Mcrib?