Didn't you see those ads where the person's lungs get cut open and they're all dirty, and that one where the person puffs on a cigarette and then the doctor is squeezing out tar from some sort of artery? there's no helping some people
Quit smoking today. For help, call 311.
Hello, 311? Yes id like to report a Beautiful Disaster
That's insane to me, though. From what I know about you (handsome, sensitive, well-read, communist-but-not-Trotskyite, feminist) you seem like every woman's dream.
Lysenko posted:since we're talking about okc here's a message i received today:
That's insane to me, though. From what I know about you (handsome, sensitive, well-read, communist-but-not-Trotskyite, feminist) you seem like every woman's dream.
Lykourgos posted:haha iwc smokes cigarettes what a moron
Didn't you see those ads where the person's lungs get cut open and they're all dirty, and that one where the person puffs on a cigarette and then the doctor is squeezing out tar from some sort of artery? there's no helping some people
for a noble man you sure are quick to indulge in a rather base, emotional appraisal of issues based on some TV ad directing hack's interpretation of 'gravitas'.
kinda sad Grumblefish......i always thought you were more of a man to direct a propaganda campaign....not consume one
Lysenko posted:since we're talking about okc here's a message i received today:
That's insane to me, though. From what I know about you (handsome, sensitive, well-read, communist-but-not-Trotskyite, feminist) you seem like every woman's dream.
please contribute to this thread i just made
http://www.rhizzone.net/forum/topic/11196/
Lysenko posted:That's insane to me, though. From what I know about you (handsome, sensitive, well-read, communist-but-not-Trotskyite, feminist) you seem like every woman's dream.
You don't admit to being a virgin, idiot.
Panopticon posted:Finally, we should not entirely neglect the third possible reduction of three to two - conservatives and socialists joining hands in opposition to liberals - even if this seems the least likely theoretically. The "conservative" character of Saint-Simonian socialism, its roots in Bonaldian ideas, has often been noticed (see Manuel, 1956 320; Iggers, 1958a, 99). The two camps could come together around their anti-individualist reflex. Equally, a liberal like von Hayek denounced the "socialist" characters of the conservative Carlyle's thought. This time, it was the "social" side of conservative thought that was in question. Lord Cecil (1912, 169) did not in fact hesitate to declare this affinity openly:
"It is often assumed that Conservatism and Socialism are directly opposed. But this is not completely true. Modern Conservatism inherits the traditions of Toryism which are favourable to the activities and the authority of the State. Indeed Mr/ Herbert Spencer attacked Socialism as being in fact the revival of Toryism."
The consequence of liberal-socialist alliance was the emergence of a sort of socialist liberalism, ending up with two varieties of liberalism. The conservative-socialist alliances, more improbable, were originally merely passing tactics. But one might wonder whether one might not think of the various "totalitarianisms" of the twentieth century as a more lasting form of this alliance, in the sense that they instituted a form of traditionalism that was both populist and social.
hell yeah, now that's what i'm talking about!
goosestepping around the washington monument with a hammer & sickle flag in my big dog T with the words "my other ideology is Bugstomping"
swirlsofhistory posted:Lysenko posted:That's insane to me, though. From what I know about you (handsome, sensitive, well-read, communist-but-not-Trotskyite, feminist) you seem like every woman's dream.
You don't admit to being a virgin, idiot.
Only losers are ashamed of their convictions, or should i say, lack there of.
