AmericanNazbro posted:
And then, suddenly, Saul goes rogue
HenryKrinkle posted:http://joeforamerica.com/2013/10/america-needs-white-republican-president/
thats actually quit impressive. when reading the full article by Kevin Jackson it becomes apparent that he is quite the talented propagandist. I wonder if it's conscious?
He's able to simultaneously espouse a neoliberal color-blind worldview yet represent it in such a way as merely championing respect for the black community. He's selling out his community to an ideology of hopeless individualism, deteriorating black community bounds, while claiming that this somehow strengthens and instill pride in the black community. From his warped color-blind notion of racism, pointing to a "black community" should itself be seen as race-baiting, and yet he subtly spins the table to appeal to the black community as if doing so gives his thoughts and intentions complete legitimacy; he's only looking out for the betterment of the black community, after all. It's a brilliantly crafted double-play, rejecting the community while pretending to strengthen it.
also i wanted to respond to this: "Juan Williams of Fox News said that mentioning the Constitution is racist" -- yeah, discussion of "the founding fathers" is nothing but racist dog whistle politics. So depending on the context, particularly with an emphasis on "original intent," discussing the constitution is super racist.
tl;dl this guy's a dumb racist. white power in black face.
(i wish it had actually been posted by joe though. that would've been funny)
edit: the patootie. she craves your patootie
aerdil posted:i loaned a girl ive been seeing journey to the end of the night. she really liked it. a definite warning sign.
my gf read some and she's like 'yeah it's good writing but i literally don't give a shit about this white french fuck's problems'
TG posted:i started reading journey to the end of night and against the day because of you fuckers. they better be good
they're not
Ironicwarcriminal posted:aerdil posted:i loaned a girl ive been seeing journey to the end of the night. she really liked it. a definite warning sign.
my gf read some and she's like 'yeah it's good writing but i literally don't give a shit about this white french fuck's problems'
yeah; i gave up midway when the protagonist guy gets africans to carry him
MadMedico posted:
Taking Žižek Seriously - The Calvinist International
But with the military analogy, it becomes clear. Proper internet citizenship entails keeping the sphere safe for american aims and interests, for commerce, trade and the propagation of american ideals, which naturally includes safeguarding yourself. Remain part of the fleet, so you can do your part.
Makeshift_Swahili posted:
*Walt's frozen head nods in agreement*
And while professors are still reluctantly trading in their typewriters for word processors, the NSA is preparing for the future: from nursery school mathematics, which continues to be fully sufficient for books, to charge-coupled devices, surface-wave filters, digital signal processors including the four basic forms of computation. Trenches, flashes of lightning, stars--storage, transmission, the laying of cables."
--Friedrich Kittler, 1986 yO!
roseweird posted:what the hell does 'end of history' mean and give me one good reason not to throw rocks at anyone who says it
it means we finally have the right set of ideas, social system and institutions to properly and best realize human freedom. that history proper is at an end and debate over "big ideas" is effectively over.
roseweird posted:how will people spend their time if not on pretending to have big ideas
"big ideas" in relation to what it means to be free. you'll still have your scientific advances and culture will continue to evolve.
roseweird posted:well okay but that sounds like continuity of history to me, just under a unified global government that declares itself to be the best and final form of government. i'm not sure if you're actually defending this concept or just explaining it, if you're just explaining it i mean i think i understand it already, i just think it is clearly empty hope propaganda and i associate it mainly with world bank/imf types who believe that they are the primary instruments of the initiation of everlasting peace on earth
I'm not defending the concept just trying to explain it as best as I understand it i.e. poorly. It's a philosophical idea first "clearly" outlined in Hegel's Philosophy of Right and has been used/critiqued by people such as Karl Marx in the Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844 and in Francis Fukuyama's The End of History and the Last Man.
yeah the phrase is kinda dumb you can blame fukuyama for its propagation and you should throw rocks at anyone b/c throwing rocks is cool
Consequently, one will find that history is not marxist and consistently ignores class