tpaine posted:you are NOT my dad!
you had asked previously so i wasn't sure
daddyholes posted:discipline posted:capital is the nastiest of the nasties, which is why no one ever says the word "capitalism" much anymore lol
in my subjective experience i feel like i have seen and heard more liberals write and talk about "capitalism" over the last five years than i had in my entire life previous, to the point that it does not seem like a Catchphrase when i talk about it with people anymore
but i think probably measured against like the entire century of 1870-1970 yeah probably you are right
i feel like whenever i hear the word 'capitalism' it's being used negatively by a leftist. even when getting into lib stuff they seem to euphemistically refer to it as 'free market enterprise' or whatever.
though i guess i do see some liberal capitalist apologists who seemingly use the word regrettably positively with the whole "not perfect, but the best we can do" mindset. so i guess it does get thrown around more diversely than i think.
babyfinland posted:yes the unfortunate and unique case in history of biased sources
I consider myself to be a Black Legend truther.
discipline posted:slumlord posted:credit crisis
a strike is a willful cessation of work. this would imply that capital works (it doesn't) and also that capital is an amorphous sentient being instead of a bunch of idiot fucking traders and factory owners. if capital stops moving it kills itself
capital is a factor of production though. like, i don't know what you're trying to argue here exactly - capital strikes have and do exist. i'll reel off examples if you like. venezuela has been dogged by capitalist sabotage and go-slows and strikes leading to things like toilet paper shortages, etc. do small proprietors (like truck drivers) not count either, as in chile in the 1970s?
capital can stop moving for a while if the result of that will be more profitable than not doing so. again, hence the assaults on leftist third world governments. it's also how welfare states get demolished basically everywhere. like do you think traders are completely automated when they decide to disinvest from the economy of a country that introduces progressive measures? like hell they are. they're dressing up a political decision as economic imperative, and for some reason you're buying that...
discipline posted:capital is the nastiest of the nasties, which is why no one ever says the word "capitalism" much anymore lol
oh please this was true 6 years ago but it's not at all any more, you know this
codywilson posted:daddyholes posted:discipline posted:capital is the nastiest of the nasties, which is why no one ever says the word "capitalism" much anymore lol
in my subjective experience i feel like i have seen and heard more liberals write and talk about "capitalism" over the last five years than i had in my entire life previous, to the point that it does not seem like a Catchphrase when i talk about it with people anymore
but i think probably measured against like the entire century of 1870-1970 yeah probably you are righti feel like whenever i hear the word 'capitalism' it's being used negatively by a leftist. even when getting into lib stuff they seem to euphemistically refer to it as 'free market enterprise' or whatever.
though i guess i do see some liberal capitalist apologists who seemingly use the word regrettably positively with the whole "not perfect, but the best we can do" mindset. so i guess it does get thrown around more diversely than i think.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/14/opinion/friedman-capitalism-version-2012.html?_r=0
capital can stop moving for a while if the result of that will be more profitable than not doing so.
jools posted:
No, I think discipline is right here. I don't know how capital can know what the rate of profit is right now, let alone into the future. It's the real profits of the owners of capital and their decisions in response to those signals that have a causal effect on the rate of profit. Normal disinvestment and hoarding of capital occur on a large scale in response to profit signals to individual capitalists, and only when there's evidence that the political aspirations of individual or groups of capitalists are behind the decision to disinvest or hoard can it be called a capital(ist) strike.
also milk is poison
Edited by Lysenko ()
swirlsofhistory posted:capital can stop moving for a while if the result of that will be more profitable than not doing so.
jools posted:No, I think discipline is right here. I don't know how capital can know what the rate of profit is right now, let alone into the future. It's the real profits of the owners of capital and their decisions in response to those signals that have a causal effect on the rate of profit. Normal disinvestment and hoarding of capital occur on a large scale in response to profit signals to individual capitalists, and only when there's evidence that the political aspirations of individual or groups of capitalists are behind the decision to disinvest or hoard can it be called a capital(ist) strike.
strikes me you're treating capitalist political aspirations as a kind of exceptional motivation for their actions?
jools posted:capital can stop moving for a while if the result of that will be more profitable than not doing so. again, hence the assaults on leftist third world governments. it's also how welfare states get demolished basically everywhere. like do you think traders are completely automated when they decide to disinvest from the economy of a country that introduces progressive measures? like hell they are. they're dressing up a political decision as economic imperative, and for some reason you're buying that...
so how long can capital stop before it must again feed? how long can a 'smart' political strategy be maintained (by business men in a smokey backroom?) before the piper must be paid?
They'd rather let their capital sit around not doing anything than pay the people to work with it.
AmericanNazbro posted:Impper posted:AmericanNazbro posted:Impper posted:
![]()
disinvestmentyo impper, hows it going on? what you've been up to
i got a Job at a digital Agency and i also own Property and i do labor on it
are you still In Love Now
yeah
Impper posted:AmericanNazbro posted:Impper posted:AmericanNazbro posted:Impper posted:
![]()
disinvestmentyo impper, hows it going on? what you've been up to
i got a Job at a digital Agency and i also own Property and i do labor on it
are you still In Love Now
yeah
tpaine posted:change swampman's username to Owl Swearengen and give him this avatar
owl have some of that
Impper posted:AmericanNazbro posted:Impper posted:AmericanNazbro posted:Impper posted:
![]()
disinvestmentyo impper, hows it going on? what you've been up to
i got a Job at a digital Agency and i also own Property and i do labor on it
are you still In Love Now
yeah
When is the baby due.
Impper posted:there wont be a baby bro
going in jointly on buying a pet is the same thing bro, just with less disappointment.