Those Palestinians were shot by Israeli terrorists yesterday. They are listed as terrorists shot by Israeli troops.
http://angryarab.blogspot.com/2011/12/you-dont-see-those-images-in-western.html
deadken posted:
mondoweiss posted an article about how american jewry is benign and enlightened and liberal and has absolutely no connection whatsoever with those crazy israeli savages lol, he's a crypto-zionist
this is common knowledge
germanjoey posted:
GOOD
dm posted:
he's right, but then again, so are americans
crustpunk_trotsky posted:dm posted:he's right, but then again, so are americans
no he's not right at all
babyfinland posted:
wow israel is lucky to have so many diamond mines!
babyfinland posted:
no he's not right at all
yes he is, newt is just a postmodern anthropologist. he rightly sees that all group designations are social constructions. fortunately, he's not a hypocrite and will soon be calling for the rights of native americans to reclaim their land
aerdil posted:babyfinland posted:
no he's not right at allyes he is, newt is just a postmodern anthropologist. he rightly sees that all group designations are social constructions. fortunately, he's not a hypocrite and will soon be calling for the rights of native americans to reclaim their land
he said "palestinians have always been included with the arabs" and thats not at all true except from the perspective of orientalists
gyrofry posted:
are nations more or less socially constructed than genders
more.
aerdil posted:
yeah the point of rightfully describing a designation as a social construction isn't to throw your hands up and say WELL ITS ALL FALSE ITS ALL A LIE SO WHO CARES but to simply assert that it is something that exists only in the abstract realm of human relations but has very real material effects due to the treatment caused in that realm. like the fact that race is a social construction but the false taxonomy invented because of it results in shit like redlining and more blacks in jail
human relations are not abstract or immaterial in themselves. i thought you were a materialist?
"your nationality, forged at worst by a densely populated community sharing extraordinary experiences for several decades, is fake and illegitimate--unlike my twenty-five-hundred year old divine land grant"
christmas_cheer posted:
I like how "socially constructed" is code for illegitimate
its not
Lessons posted:
human relations are not abstract or immaterial in themselves. i thought you were a materialist?
do you think it's inconsistent to be a 'materialist' and also believe that immaterial entities such as 'nations' have material manifestations and consequences?
gyrofry posted:
do you think it's inconsistent to be a 'materialist' and also believe that immaterial entities such as 'nations' have material manifestations and consequences?
nations aren't immaterial, or at least not any more immaterial than, say, relations of production or class. in any case of course not, and anyone who says nations (or nationalist movements for that matter) don't have material manifestations is very confused. even a hardline historical materialist wouldn't disagree with that, (though they would quibble about proximate and ultimate causes).
Edited by Lessons ()
discipline posted:
the same people have been living in nablus for thousands of years
probably not, most humans die in under 100 years.
Answer: whoever takes it and keeps it for another thousand years
j_sakai posted:
What we never should lose sight of is that these may be socially constructed differences--but they are real... So we even find some middle-class white men claiming that they've "given up being white" (I can hear my grandmother saying, "More white foolishness!" with a dismissing headshake). Needless to say, they haven't given up anything. Race as a form of class is very tangible, solid, material, as real as a tank division running over you... tank divisions, after all, are also socially constructed!