#6441
you want lame and unfunny, louis CK is your man

'mrah i'm a fat and lazy divorcee' yeah we get it Louis you look like Hilary Clinton
#6442
[account deactivated]
#6443
[account deactivated]
#6444
hows ya friday night iwc got anything planned for long weekend?
#6445

tpaine posted:

whats milliondollarextreme precious



someone whose entire joke is clearing a room of an audience

#6446
i want to stress that i find this funny
#6447

deadken posted:

i like stand up comedy. yall are weird lol



Thanks for being the voice of reason Ken. Your all right.

#6448
more like the voice of.... BEESon!!!! *dissolves into an immense swarm of bees, which chants in a hellish polyphonic buzz "stand-up comedy is sometimes ok"*
#6449

daddyholes posted:

i want to stress that i find this funny

the replacements used to do this a lot, they'd play shows in the middle of nowhere, half the audience rednecks, half punk fans. they'd play country classics until the punks got upset and went home, then they'd switch to the hardest punk they could muster until the rednecks got upset and went home.

#6450
good discussions here about a twitter post or youtube video or whateve.r
#6451
Nice now we got a flow chart. Good Shit
#6452
You all need to get a job and lift weights. Mold your pudgy worthless pink flesh into hardened steel to be the tip of the spear in the coming RaHoWa.
#6453

daddyholes posted:

i mean i have rarely seen anything as pathetic as this




no wolf puppy, voted 1

#6454

daddyholes posted:

i mean i have rarely seen anything as pathetic as this




I also like how they're all reacting to that prodigalsam guy stealing twitter jokes by harassing him for weeks and basically acting like he should face a war crimes tribunal.

#6455

AmericanNazbro posted:

good discussions here about a twitter post or youtube video or whateve.r

Yeah id say, i have something between 1 and 5 percent of a clue about what happen with second twitter or whatever

#6456
The articles posted about this event read like completely gibberish and thats a point of frieking pride for me ok?!
#6457
sorry for getting this thread discussing goons on twitter.

look at this shit:
http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pubs/display.cfm?pubid=1139
#6458
[account deactivated]
#6459
[account deactivated]
#6460
[account deactivated]
#6461
http://favstar.fm/users/dril
#6462
Guevara, Guerilla Warfare
#6463
Slavery, Profitability,
and the Market Process
Mark Thornton
Mises Institute

The profitability thesis provides one resolution to this contradic-
tion by accepting the Civil War as a political solution for a market-
created problem of slavery. According to this revisionist thinking,
America's bloodiest and most destructive conflict becomes the solu-
tion to the vexing problem of the morally intolerable institution of
slavery.6

This paper offers an alternative explanation of the profitability
of slavery that is consistent with traditional history and economic
theory. This explanation, based on economic theory, finds the prof-
itability thesis wrong where it is relevant and irrelevant where it
is correct. This explanation disputes the implications that slavery
and the slave trade are market phenomena and that slavery was

"profitable." Slavery is found to be theoretically and historically a
political institution incapable of existing in open-market competi-
tion.'
Slavery is demonstrated to have survived in the antebellum
South, not because of the market, but because political forces pre-
vented the typical decay and destruction of slavery experienced
elsewhere.... State slave codes restricted and prevented the market-based
method of emancipation and therefore precluded a general emanci-
pation of slaves. More precisely, two typical state statutes that sig-
nificantly reduced the private costs of slavery are shown to have been
largely ignored, thereby propagating the impression of slavery's effi-
ciency. Specifically, slave patrol statutes socialized the costs of polic-
ing slavery and recapturing runaway slaves by drafting non-slave-
holders into slave patrols. Second, state statutes prohibited or effec-
tively restricted private manumission of slaves. Combined with stat-
utes that prevented immigration, required emigration, and restricted
the movement and rights of free blacks, the slave codes significantly
reduced the costs and risks of the slave owner by reducing and
socializing the enforcement costs of slavery.'

6 Goldin in (1973, p. 84) argues that the war was not a cost-effective emancipation
mechanism. However, this justification was established after the fact (when costs tend
to matter less) and may well be responsible for the substantial popularity of this
revisionist view (also see Goldin and Lewis 1975).

7 The market should be understood to be a separate and distinct phenomenon from
government. "Capitalism" refers to the entire social system that consists of a market
economy that is subjected to government intervention. Understanding the results of
capitalism therefore requires that the effects of the market process be isolated from the
effects of the political process.

tl;dr Socialism == Slavery
#6464

mustang posted:

Slavery, Profitability,
and the Market Process
Mark Thornton
Mises Institute

The profitability thesis provides one resolution to this contradic-
tion by accepting the Civil War as a political solution for a market-
created problem of slavery. According to this revisionist thinking,
America's bloodiest and most destructive conflict becomes the solu-
tion to the vexing problem of the morally intolerable institution of
slavery.6

This paper offers an alternative explanation of the profitability
of slavery that is consistent with traditional history and economic
theory. This explanation, based on economic theory, finds the prof-
itability thesis wrong where it is relevant and irrelevant where it
is correct. This explanation disputes the implications that slavery
and the slave trade are market phenomena and that slavery was

"profitable." Slavery is found to be theoretically and historically a
political institution incapable of existing in open-market competi-
tion.'
Slavery is demonstrated to have survived in the antebellum
South, not because of the market, but because political forces pre-
vented the typical decay and destruction of slavery experienced
elsewhere.... State slave codes restricted and prevented the market-based
method of emancipation and therefore precluded a general emanci-
pation of slaves. More precisely, two typical state statutes that sig-
nificantly reduced the private costs of slavery are shown to have been
largely ignored, thereby propagating the impression of slavery's effi-
ciency. Specifically, slave patrol statutes socialized the costs of polic-
ing slavery and recapturing runaway slaves by drafting non-slave-
holders into slave patrols. Second, state statutes prohibited or effec-
tively restricted private manumission of slaves. Combined with stat-
utes that prevented immigration, required emigration, and restricted
the movement and rights of free blacks, the slave codes significantly
reduced the costs and risks of the slave owner by reducing and
socializing the enforcement costs of slavery.'

6 Goldin in (1973, p. 84) argues that the war was not a cost-effective emancipation
mechanism. However, this justification was established after the fact (when costs tend
to matter less) and may well be responsible for the substantial popularity of this
revisionist view (also see Goldin and Lewis 1975).

7 The market should be understood to be a separate and distinct phenomenon from
government. "Capitalism" refers to the entire social system that consists of a market
economy that is subjected to government intervention. Understanding the results of
capitalism therefore requires that the effects of the market process be isolated from the
effects of the political process.


\


mustang posted:

tl;dr Socialism == Slavery


#6465
i watched some george carlin 'tubes and jesus christ that guy is fuckin insufferable. i'm glad he's dead
#6466
Still better than bill hicks lol
#6467
lol the comments are full of people who think someone going "american people are so fat. we're so fat. we cover everything in cheese and our kids are ugly" makes his adorno or something
#6468
i was reading the first part of emma goldman's biography last week, the way that her arrival on the scene is immediately followed by every male leader she interacts with fucking everything up via idiotic macho competition for her affections is really familiar and hilarious
#6469

deadken posted:

i watched some george carlin 'tubes and jesus christ that guy is fuckin insufferable. i'm glad he's dead

the only thing i can figure out w/him is that in 1979 or whatever, saying "football isn't actually very good" was like cutting edge mindblowing shit and in comparison, people are now supergeniuses

#6470
Rodney Dangerfield
#6471
george carlin is an anti-comedian and he's making fun of americans by taking their dumb ideas to their illogical conclusions. he's brilliant at what he does. stand by your man.
#6472
George carlin sucks gf. He does dumb puns and really basic observational humor. We can look @ his era and see other, better ppl doing interesting and ground breaking stuff so you can't even say its just dulled over time. This is my opinion.
#6473
How can you possibly hate George Carlin. You people are sick
#6474
I respect Kevens opinion because he's funnier than me but please explain
#6475
pryor could roast the hell out of anyone to a degree that carlin doesn't seem capable.
#6476
Chris rock does a funny bit about black folks vs ninjas
#6477
he is tired of ninjas
#6478

gyrofry posted:

he is tired of ninjas


What about pirates or zombies?

#6479
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/06/08/4-year-old-boy-accidentally-kills-dad-in-arizona/

4-year-old boy accidentally shoots, kills Iraq War veteran dad in Arizona
#6480
http://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1927/10/23.htm

A characteristic fact. In August this year, after the plenum of the Central Committee and Central Control Commission, Trotsky and Zinoviev sent in a statement that they wanted to speak at a meeting of the Moscow active if the Central Committee had no objection. To this the Central Committee replied (and the reply was circulated among the local organisations) that it had no objection to Trotsky and Zinoviev speaking at such a meeting, provided, however, that they, as members of the Central Committee, did not speak against the decisions of the Central Committee. What happened? They dropped their request. (General laughter.)