littlegreenpills posted:male sexual desire is p. bad and there is a good case for eliminating it
male sexuality ftw my friends. obsession, determination, and physical conquest for all who consent to be conquered
However, certain points against welfare can still be made. First, while crises don't lead to revolutions, exploitation does and people on welfare are not exploited. Even for those on welfare that are potential workers, it alleviates exploitation, and the proletariat simply cannot exist without exploitation. Saying anything that benefits the working class benefits proletariat is a huge mistake, one that I shall argue, leads to genocide.
To begin my second point, while peasants in China and Russia owned more of the means of production, this isn't what lead to revolution in these countries; what lead to revolution in these countries is their transformation into a horizontal nation-class by imperialism. However, the basis of this class was NOT exploitation, it was genocide or the risk of genocide. One of the important innovations made recently in revolutionary thought is that the basis of surplus value is not only the exploitation of workers but also genocide. I think this is best articulated by Maria Mies in her Patriarchy & World Accumulation when she states, "It is my thesis that this general production of life, or subsistence production-- mainly performed through the non-wage labor of women and other non-wage laborers as slaves, contract workers and peasants in the colonies-- constitutes the perennial basis upon which 'capitalist productive labor' can be built up and exploited." So when we allow workers to be content with merely being workers, this is what we allow to perpetuated. Furthermore, welfare leads to the internal consolidation of the settler nation-class that is necessary for this system to function: welfare encourages reproduction of "natural born" citizens to maintain the population without the help of immigration, it creates dependency upon the government rather than forming connections with the lumpen-proletariat (which I think are much more revolutionary than Marx realized), when crises arise exceptions can be created so that the liquidation of unwanted persons can more precisely fit the current needs of the bourgeoisie and what is political feasible for them, etc. There are very good reasons why social democracy is associated with fascism, materially they are extremely similar, with the small difference being that fascism has a narrower definition of the nation.
mustang posted:The real reason why there is no Milton Friedman today is that liberals realize social welfare is the most effective way of preserving capitalism and Krugman/DeLong types are conspiring against the communist revolution by advocating reformist policies.
Because Rhizzone is entirely made up of center-leftists pretending to advocate Juche Communism, your efforts to expand the welfare state only advance liberal goals. This is why you should not follow the welfarist line in "austerity versus stimulus" or "global warming" debates at all. Marx and Engels would be disgusted with you. If you were true revolutionaries you would favor reduction in social programs to strengthen worker's revolutionary consciousness.
after Adolf Hitler soviet union's territory expanded 24.543%. I know you skinny little hipsters will never understand this, but i'm "just saying"
daddyholes posted:haha yes accelerationism my friends. inject pepsi in my veins and make me a Terminator
all outta terminator pepsi but we still got some
also marimite whatchu talking about people on welfare aren't exploited? boy come here lemme tell you about welfare reform and workfare.
StalinsBoyToy posted:ChairmanMao posted:The Orgasm as Rebellion: Sexual Resistance through a Marxian Lens
a seminal worksexual desire is explicitly counter-revolutionary
I was reading something I can't remember, maybe it was something from a new American socialist party, but it talked about how being in love has a damaging effect on membership. lmao
jools posted:anyway i don't think you've read marx given you're spouting nechaevesque crap, plus that stuff is from before marx became an anti-imperialist anyway
when did marx start getting his beard wet and becum an anti-imperialist?
animedad posted:StalinsBoyToy posted:ChairmanMao posted:The Orgasm as Rebellion: Sexual Resistance through a Marxian Lens
a seminal worksexual desire is explicitly counter-revolutionary
I was reading something I can't remember, maybe it was something from a new American socialist party, but it talked about how being in love has a damaging effect on membership. lmao
look how quickly impper abandoned us after falling in love...its a cruel world
tpaine posted:impper died asshole
the same way he lived
Edited by cemetery ()
cemetery posted:i love eating out a cute boys asshole so i can get my shemale dick hard enough to stick it in him
hell yeah
ChairmanMao posted:cemetery posted:i love eating out a cute boys asshole so i can get my shemale dick hard enough to stick it in him
hell yeah
fuck off fuckwit
Except for mustang
Edited by Superabound ()
Barbarossa posted:I just wanted to say that you guys are the best.
Except for mustang
thanks barbie
Superabound posted:
lol
p.s. can you post the EO ragecomic so i can add it to my sig
EmanuelaOrlandi posted:lol
p.s. can you post the EO ragecomic so i can add it to my sig