getfiscal posted:are we running out of asians?
thats extremely racist getfiscal. for shame for shame.
Just another example of lazy leftists who automatically absorb hegemonic propaganda of history because it's easier rather than creating an entirely new Marxist history.
Goethestein posted:discuss
i once almost got in a literal fistfight with my dad over this lol
Goethestein posted:the thing i think i like best is that even otherwise nonracist liberals will say shit like "the japanese culture at the time was such that every man, woman and child would fight to the death to avoid a loss of honor"
in their defense, our parents' (grandparents for some of you) generation has had the bullshit national excuses for the single largest atrocity ever perpetrated upon the human race drilled into their heads every second of the day for literally the first 20 some odd years of their lives, witha strong dose of booster shots every time they watch the History Channel
mustang19 posted:Nip imperialism was actually a lot better than European imperialism. They built up schools and industry in their colonies which was why Korea and Taiwan had a head start on everyone else after WWII.
Unit 731 lol.
mustang19 posted:Nip imperialism was actually a lot better than European imperialism. They built up schools and industry in their colonies which was why Korea and Taiwan had a head start on everyone else after WWII.
This is 100% true, I had a professor from Korea University who presented a paper at KU that the development of the Asian tigers was the result of development of industry, education, and a comprador bourgeoisie by the Japanese. He was told he should leave and probably not come back to the school anymore.
Cycloneboy posted:mustang19 posted:Nip imperialism was actually a lot better than European imperialism. They built up schools and industry in their colonies which was why Korea and Taiwan had a head start on everyone else after WWII.
Unit 731 lol.
obviously China is a different story but Mao still correctly identified American imperialism as the major enemy of the masses of the oppressed third world
i guess radiation is scary???
Nip imperialism was actually a lot better than European imperialism. They built up schools and industry in their colonies which was why Korea and Taiwan had a head start on everyone else after WWII.
the gentlest genocide
The US negotiators drove them off by insisting on completely ridiculous terms of surrender. I think the actual deal they wound up with (after the nukes dropped) bore an uncanny resemblance to the initial terms of those tentatively rogue generals. Gotta flex those atomic muscles!
It's been a loooong time since I read that and I can't even remember where from so it might all be bullshit, but I remember that book otherwise being totally orthodox with regards to the US being angelic saviors so it struck me as a little odd that detail snuck in.
If the Jews had nuked Ramallah in 48 we’d be playing games on Palestinian consoles right now.
Goethestein posted:here's a simple fact that nobody ever seems to want to bring up: japan is an island, and at the time had its navy, airforce, and foreign presence almost completely destroyed, and every one of its closest neighbors a bitter enemy. even if japan really was this hell on earth where we couldn't send in troops without losing tens of thousands of them just to yellow infants popping out of their cribs with bared teeth like rage zombies, we could just have blockaded the island and instituted sanctions. even if the japanese were not willing to surrender, which they were by the way, a land invasion was not necessary which removes the bullshit false moral dichotomy of "lose a million of Are Own Boys or a few hundred thousand civilians"
It’s because men are genetically predisposed to be violent goat; whining about America obliterating Japanese cities is like whining about a bear catching a salmon.
littlegreenpills posted:childlords
lol
babyhueypnewton posted:creating an entirely new Marxist history.
goon project!!
discipline posted:Ironicwarcriminal posted:
If the Jews had nuked Ramallah in 48 we’d be playing games on Palestinian consoles right now.
Ramallah in 1948 was like a village with 500 people, man. glad I never met u there
That’s Zionist nonsense designed to justify the erasure of a civilization by appealing to it’s mythical primitive nature. Ramallah actually had 450,000 people and a highly developed tech sector.
Agnus_Dei posted:
remember when maggotmaster spammed this in the LF political cartoons thread and a lot of "liberals" got "buttmad"? i dont but he conveniently reminded his tumblr followers of the incident



Goethestein posted:otherwise nonracist liberals
catchphrase
Goethestein posted:here's a simple fact that nobody ever seems to want to bring up: japan is an island, and at the time had its navy, airforce, and foreign presence almost completely destroyed, and every one of its closest neighbors a bitter enemy. even if japan really was this hell on earth where we couldn't send in troops without losing tens of thousands of them just to yellow infants popping out of their cribs with bared teeth like rage zombies, we could just have blockaded the island and instituted sanctions. even if the japanese were not willing to surrender, which they were by the way, a land invasion was not necessary which removes the bullshit false moral dichotomy of "lose a million of Are Own Boys or a few hundred thousand civilians"
Considering what Japan was like in 1945 that probably would have killed more people than the A-bombs. Starvation remained a serious problem even in the early phases of the occupation, although the complete destruction of their industrial infrastructure probably had a part in that alongside the blockade.