#1
Post rating: ~
there was an old post probably on the 'deep about the catastrophe that is forensic evidence, including fingerprints and other techniques having no scientific underpinning.

Anyone save it or know of similar resources?
#2
Online
Post rating: +
Allahu_Snackbar
#3
Kurdt
Post rating: +
LaserJew
#4
Post rating: +
say it 3 times into a mirror in the dark and i'll circumcise you with a photon beam
#5
Kurdt
Post rating: ~
please refrain from reinforcing hurtful stereotypes
#6
D.C.
Post rating: ~
It was on old lf and it was good. Might even be in the goldmine
#7
Post rating: ~
there was a national academies of science report on the issue a few years back:

http://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpinews/newsitem.aspx?recordid=12589

not sure if thats quite as scathing as what youre looking for, but its still pretty damning
#8
Post rating: ~

TG posted:

there was a national academies of science report on the issue a few years back:

http://www8.nationalacademies.org/onpinews/newsitem.aspx?recordid=12589

not sure if thats quite as scathing as what youre looking for, but its still pretty damning


But is that enough to convince a jury?

#9
Post rating: +
http://lfeffortposts.wordpress.com/2011/01/18/forensic-science-and-the-law/
#10
Post rating: +
thanks hitler
#11
[account deactivated]
#12
Post rating: ~
http://www.smh.com.au/world/welcome-back-mr-taylor-new-evidence-frees-man-42-years-after-deadly-hotel-fire-20130405-2haon.html

thanks a lot science *rolls eyes*
#13
Post rating: +
Lawyer: Dog Do you think this guy did the murder?

Dog: Woof! Woof!

Lawyer: Might I remind you that your sworn in under oath dog

Dog: Lol Yeaaaaaaaaaa u think this is my first rodeo chief? lmao.