getfiscal posted:

what sort of sad-ass racist dates an indonesian woman. try to think of one civilizational achievement of southeast asians. was it piles of skulls? yeah that's about it. maybe some gilded lily temples to a fat nihilist. the fact you'd risk mixing up your genes in that mess sort of undercuts your whole rightist cred.

after HCL2's posts i've been reading My Posting Career because he seems like the sort of dude who would have posted there.

They're pretty funny, i'll give them that. They inevitably devolve into beyond-stupid arguments ('you're just pretending to hate jews, i smell a jew') and the haught Grumblefish-meets-evilweasal 'I Am A Noble Man Discussing History' thing is a bit much but you know what?

they're better at making fun of liberals than the rhizzone

We do want to give it the amount of thought it warrants: namely, some people are biologically abnormal, while some others are perverts. I think that's a relevant distinction. You feel sympathy for the former, horror towards the latter.

As for the poz stuff, it's relevant not only when people want to teach it to your kids, but when it's made the basis for public policy. In many countries, parents don't have the choice to homeschool, so in such countries you can't avoid having the conversation. But even in America, poz is imposed by law and convention, on the Church, the Boy Scouts, popular media and books, etc. It changes the standards for what's acceptable in the public sphere. Suddenly, autogynephiles are acceptable; and you, DWS, you are not acceptable.

There's a day coming when your kids will ask you why you hate niggers and fags. You'd better have an answer ready. Likewise for trannies. Let's hope it's later rather than sooner, but let's not pretend it'll never happen.

it's all like this

libelous_slander posted:

How are there nearly 5500 members on this site lol

also linku~ to my posting career

i have 3 accounsrt, one of them downvoted me earlier for calling stalin fascist

Ironicwarcriminal posted:

beats reading the guardian or new york times haha

haha there was a thread on that NY firefighter who got fired for sending racist tweets so i clicked it, thinking it would be full of invective about social-justice-pozzed up beta-n00glets who reported and harrassed a tough, white, heroic public servant who was driven to the brink by minorities in the hoods he served......

....instead they were calling him a faggot for crying like a bitch in front of cameras l.o.l.

Seriously, what do you not get about it being impossible to argue with liberals on a purely humanistic standpoint? Their entire life is devoted to proving that some idiot cause is worth destroying liberty, they make emotional appeals better than anyone because they're nothing but bags of disjointed feelings, and they are absolutely ceaseless at refusing to concede valid points by memorizing corner cases. Yes, if everyone in the entire country spent hours upon hours weekly reading about pozzed public schools and flash mobs then yes you might get your point across, but they don't. Trying to focus on being more "articulate" when some guy on the other end of the aisle is going to rail about the evils of fag bashing is a lost cause, and by arguing with him on an equal level you only elevate his ideals.

Anyway to answer your question, taking myself out of any place where there's a huge liberal following is great, I don't have to deal with a bunch of miserable people whose lives are all severe wrecks. As soon as I get out of my iPhone contract I will never buy another Apple product again, and I can't wait until more conservatives get tired of all the bullshit and pay down their debt and withdraw from the liberal ideas of going into debt, participating in a pozzed culture and settle into more simple ideals.

fucking Lol

jools posted:

actually he's quite farsighted, when the oil runs out we'll just go back to slavery or w/e

if you extract all the silly handwringing about the blood purity its just an engineer whining about unfair it is that his autistic brain can't compete in the moral/political sphere. its iRoNiC

AmericanNazbro posted:

hahahah

it's why it's so entertaining. You see reactionaries talk openly without the weasel shit they use in mainstream discourse, and they offer occasionally some pretty great criticism of identity politics, liberal hypocrisies or the ideology of the mass media....and then they let some little details slip and you just picture the suburban house, the naggy wife who they obey but bitch about, the sensitive young boy who he resents because he's growing up to be a beta-nerd just like his father.....oh yeah and all the debt

HenryKrinkle posted:

Crow posted:

libelous_slander posted:

How are there nearly 5500 members on this site lol

lmao

http://www.rhizzone.net/forum/users/

lmao has tpaine been through and greeted every single one

Crow posted:

` ` NIGGERS, JEWS, AND CUMDUMPSTERS -- I DRANK THE BLEACH. ` `

one time my friend J did shrooms every other day for over a year and he got sucked into stormfront and the accompanying nihilism for about 3 years... even though he was born in Peru! but he was never brave enough to date a girl as dark as him. hey buddy did you do a lot of shrooms?

Ironicwarcriminal posted:

in all seriousness though it would be fascinating to see a legitimate sociological study of Jewish privilege, modeled on the same sorts of things that more familiar privilege discourse is: Access to education, jobs, 'good old boys' networks, representation in the media, the universalizing of values etc.

I actually read one of these although it only looked at employment and income. After being jewish the easiest way to get a job in entertainment is to be a quaker. Anybody with access to academic databases could probably dig a few articles up. If you want into the good old boys' networks go for the presbyterian or episcopal church.

discipline posted:

you've already leered at my photos and wgispered my name to yourself, imagining me as your wife and mother of your mongrel children,

Ironicwarcriminal posted:

in all seriousness though it would be fascinating to see a legitimate sociological study of Jewish privilege, modeled on the same sorts of things that more familiar privilege discourse is: Access to education, jobs, 'good old boys' networks, representation in the media, the universalizing of values etc.

being a jew in california is completely different than being a jew in, say, russia so the study would either be completely skewed or have to specify the area they live in as well. anti-semitism is a real thing and violence and oppression of jews happens all the time, just not in the west so much