#1
[account deactivated]
#2
and while we're at why not institute one-world neolib government? tell us what you truly desire mr fukuyama
#3
hmm yes lets copy britain, their democracy is working so well
#4

deadken posted:
hmm yes lets copy britain, their democracy is working so well



like driving a Maserati towards the edge of a cliff

#5
unfortunately, jeremy clarkson is not in it
#6
[account deactivated]
#7
Guess we haven't reached the end of history yet
#8
we've reached it, only problem is not everyone is toeing the line yet
#9
For more analysis on how to more efficiently institute austerity measures, check out Scott Adams' article "What if the government were more like an Ipad?"
#10
more like brown pants
#11
[account deactivated]
#12
bourgeois legalism formula A is immensely superior to bourgeois legalism formula B
#13
[account deactivated]
#14
i just realized the irony of him talking about political paralysis
#15

animedad posted:
we've reached it, only problem is not everyone is toeing the line yet


YOu kids got 5 seasons of the wire, what else do you freakin want!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

#16
turn off your caps lock key. i guess its your gimmick or w/e but it makes you look like youre gonna start talking about time cube
#17
oh shit i just remembered: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2007/apr/03/thehistoryattheendofhist

2007 posted:
The End of History was never linked to a specifically American model of social or political organisation. Following Alexandre Kojève, the Russian-French philosopher who inspired my original argument, I believe that the European Union more accurately reflects what the world will look like at the end of history than the contemporary United States. The EU's attempt to transcend sovereignty and traditional power politics by establishing a transnational rule of law is much more in line with a "post-historical" world than the Americans' continuing belief in God, national sovereignty, and their military.



i think that gives it a status above just being "that book that was really smug about liberal democracy after the collapse of the Soviet Union" or w/e. it should be considered as a historical document for future generations to understand what the fuck people were thinking

#18
[account deactivated]
#19

dm posted:
oh shit i just remembered: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2007/apr/03/thehistoryattheendofhist

2007 posted:
The End of History was never linked to a specifically American model of social or political organisation. Following Alexandre Kojève, the Russian-French philosopher who inspired my original argument, I believe that the European Union more accurately reflects what the world will look like at the end of history than the contemporary United States. The EU's attempt to transcend sovereignty and traditional power politics by establishing a transnational rule of law is much more in line with a "post-historical" world than the Americans' continuing belief in God, national sovereignty, and their military.



i think that gives it a status above just being "that book that was really smug about liberal democracy after the collapse of the Soviet Union" or w/e. it should be considered as a historical document for future generations to understand what the fuck people were thinking



lmao

#20

DRUXXX posted:
turn off your caps lock key. i guess its your gimmick or w/e but it makes you look like youre gonna start talking about time cube

we already got two catchphrases! Keep up the good work team. soon we will approach the end of forums history. EU (yew) Butter believe it!

#21
[account deactivated]
#22

tpaine posted:
Turn off your caps lock key. User loses posting privileges for millions of years.


Just wondering - is it just your nature to be a twatting simp at all times? Perhaps a few nights in the hole will clear your head. Unless it's your nature to be a big honking slice of douchecake at all times, in which case, it probably won't. Oh, and before it slips my giant brain - CAPS LOCK.