tpaine posted:the shiteating bacteria in any human belly provide more for women than men do
if you exclude food, minerals, electricity, oil, lumber, housing, and security
Goethestein posted:tpaine posted:the shiteating bacteria in any human belly provide more for women than men do
if you exclude food, minerals, electricity, oil, lumber, housing, and security
no, the shiteating bacteria in any human belly provides more than that
Goethestein posted:if you exclude food, minerals, electricity, oil, lumber, housing, and security
men may provide lumber
but women give us wood
Goethestein posted:let's also not forget that virtually all scientific advancements and works of art were made by men
women are works of art
AmericanNazbro was probated until (Feb. 20, 2013 16:54:41) for this post!
tpaine posted:imagine i distributed upvotes and downvotes to posts in this thread according to whatever fucking delimiter you wish
Chaos Reigns...
stegosaurus posted:Lets see if we can make these posts any creepier guys
stegosaurus posted:Lets see if we can make these posts any creepier guys
Crow posted:stegosaurus posted:Lets see if we can make these posts any creepier guys
2:44
Men Sentenced To Longer Prison Terms Than Women For Same Crimes, Study Says
QQ objectification
Goethestein posted:i don't understand why feminists are so down on capitalism, the advent of industry and capitalism was a prerequisite to their attempts at equality.
everything is good, except breaking bad.
discipline posted:1 in 3 women in the USA take some sort of psychiatric medication but I guess that's just their fault for not being sufficiently grateful for thousands of years of marital rape
No that's called scientific progress, unless you would prefer to return to the era of ECT and lobotomies
Edited by Lykourgos ()
Impper posted:why d u watch tv show goatstien
4 entertainments.
Goethestein posted:let's also not forget that virtually all scientific advancements and works of art were made by men
i cant believe i forgot that
Lykourgos posted:Bacteria doesn't get credit for helping women because they lack the requisite intent
Same except men
Goethestein posted:throughout all of history in every society men have provided for women, until recently almost exclusively through dangerous hard labor or military service. maybe some gratefulness would be good.
That's not even remotely true and it definitely wasn't true in prehistory, which was a heck of a lot longer!!!
In many polygynous societies the role of women as providers is so important that there is a huge economic incentive to acquire more wives,
see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polygyny#Economics
In hunter gather societies you'd typically see a division of labor in which women provided the majority of calories in the form of gathered tubers seeds nuts and such. Women could reliably feed themselves and their families like this but it takes constant toil to collect wild vegetables in the quantities necessary to survive. In contrast male hunters could potentially reap a huge return in meat with little effort on a good hunt, but more often than not came home empty handed to eat wifey's pine nuts. Turns out killing anything with rocks and sticks is actually really tough.
When agriculture came around women didn't get a break either. See this modern photo of a man and woman working together to plant rice in India http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Working_in_the_rice_paddy.jpg
Besides women have often gone to extreme lengths to demonstrate their gratitude for men's labors. During famine times among Inuit hunter-gatherers the men had the privilege of eating first. First the mothers stopped breast feeding, then they stopped feeding the children, then the women went hungry, and the men last. Admittedly this wasn't because everybody thought dad deserved his share of seal blubber more. Rather it was a practical acknowledgement of cruel circumstances man faced in the arctic: If you can't hunt, you die.
discipline posted:1 in 3 women in the USA take some sort of psychiatric medication but I guess that's just their fault for not being sufficiently grateful for thousands of years of marital rape
That's cool... I don't have health insurance
discipline posted:Same I also don't have health insurance, but it's my own fault for refusing to work harder
lol so much aggression
discipline posted:men hate women today more than ever
You are forgetting a little something called women's suffrage; or how about the fact women were allowed to enlist in the armed forces before gay men? Me thinks the facts betray you.
AmericanNazbro was probated until (Feb. 20, 2013 16:54:59) for this post!
Squalid posted:Goethestein posted:throughout all of history in every society men have provided for women, until recently almost exclusively through dangerous hard labor or military service. maybe some gratefulness would be good.
That's not even remotely true and it definitely wasn't true in prehistory, which was a heck of a lot longer!!!
In many polygynous societies the role of women as providers is so important that there is a huge economic incentive to acquire more wives,
see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polygyny#Economics
In hunter gather societies you'd typically see a division of labor in which women provided the majority of calories in the form of gathered tubers seeds nuts and such. Women could reliably feed themselves and their families like this but it takes constant toil to collect wild vegetables in the quantities necessary to survive. In contrast male hunters could potentially reap a huge return in meat with little effort on a good hunt, but more often than not came home empty handed to eat wifey's pine nuts. Turns out killing anything with rocks and sticks is actually really tough.
When agriculture came around women didn't get a break either. See this modern photo of a man and woman working together to plant rice in India http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Working_in_the_rice_paddy.jpg
Besides women have often gone to extreme lengths to demonstrate their gratitude for men's labors. During famine times among Inuit hunter-gatherers the men had the privilege of eating first. First the mothers stopped breast feeding, then they stopped feeding the children, then the women went hungry, and the men last. Admittedly this wasn't because everybody thought dad deserved his share of seal blubber more. Rather it was a practical acknowledgement of cruel circumstances man faced in the arctic: If you can't hunt, you die.
men delegated foraging to women because it was easy.
When I look at how different societies have distributed social roles between men and women I notice a pattern: Women are expected to suffer the bulk of the day to day labors of subsistence; men on the other hand are relatively liberated from daily drudgery, but to justify this they have also assumed responsibility for the most dangerous- and yeah, physically demanding- occupations within their society. Which is position is better is better isn't really straight forward.
Of course if you're a Hindu woman before 1840 or so if your idiot husband got himself killed doing something stupid you'd be thrown onto his funeral pyre so you kinda shared his risks... I'd love to read something about how the ban on immolating widows affected Indian gender relations.
discipline posted:what used to be wrapped up in sickly-sweet chivalry and hidden domestic abuse is now discarded of its bindings, unleashed. women "no longer hold any role in society", they are "free to make their own choices" and also simply incidental baby machines and for me to dump my cum on, with no histories and no souls, because god does not exist. they are dumb bitches who were given freedom and squandered it, now look at them come crawling back to daddy in my favorite porno. she's really going to get what she deserves, that cunt, look at him slap her around a little and come on her face. look how she loves it.
Wjat does this classic goatstein post have to do with anything