#41
by applying the revolutionary stone
#42

Impper posted:

me and my friends kind of accidentally ran up to doing it because of the liberal horror at the guy



Some friend of a friend of a friend jokester at a party the other night thought he was being real irreverent by riling up some girls (my friends) about how hunting was natural and I’m like “yeah, it’s kinda just like that circle of life song by Elton john” and he’s like “EXACTLY” and then I’m like “or that school in Connecticut last month” and he got like super offended and looked around at people genuinely sort of scoffing like “can you believe that” and my friends are just like yeah whatever that’s iwc

And then everybody sat down and smoked

Thanks, I’ll be here all week try the veal

#43
oh man i sound like a valley girl need to cut those likes down
#44
[account deactivated]
#45

tpaine posted:

oi, ai seund loike a valleh gehl



#46
[account deactivated]
#47

Get_A_Job posted:

Really, I'll give you a chance. Convince me communism works. I see the US standing tall and China following suit by adopting free-trade, capitalist-friendly policies. Meanwhile, the Soviets are thrashing and the Cubans are starving. Even Venezuala is waking up to the scam that is socialism.

#48

getfiscal posted:

well you have to include partial successes and a wider range of countries if you want a fair picture. like venezuela isn't a socialist country but i wouldn't say that electoralism or whatever has been a complete failure in that country.

wouldn't you say that the possibility of electoral bolivarianism in venezuela was created by the general cultural current of militant leftism in latin america? like isn't chavez in some way riding the coattails of his predecessors (not necessarily in venezuela) who did not proceed through the electoral route? and weren't those predecessors in turn enabled and supported by the covert resources of large communist nation-states?

#49

gyrofry posted:

getfiscal posted:
well you have to include partial successes and a wider range of countries if you want a fair picture. like venezuela isn't a socialist country but i wouldn't say that electoralism or whatever has been a complete failure in that country.
wouldn't you say that the possibility of electoral bolivarianism in venezuela was created by the general cultural current of militant leftism in latin america? like isn't chavez in some way riding the coattails of his predecessors (not necessarily in venezuela) who did not proceed through the electoral route? and weren't those predecessors in turn enabled and supported by the covert resources of large communist nation-states?



yea but it is still electoralism its just that like all revolutionary methods the mechanics are semi irrelevant compared to the social reality that they exist in and are produced by and the ability of forces in the struggle to match them

#50
hey chris i think i might come back to chicago in a couple weeks
#51
hey chris i think i might come back to chicago in a couple weeks
#52
[account deactivated]
#53
There exists Only Joel here.
#54
joel gave me mad light beers. good shit so i didnt intake too many calories and lose my pump
#55

a left-wing deviation in the case of guerilla strategies, which are sometimes adopted by forces affected by subjectivism in order to avoid doing the work required to root themselves in the class.



gotta watch out for that

#11 The Strategy of Protracted Revolutionary Warfare seems most relevant today as many countries are deruralizing. Leninist-Komintern insurrection is extremely risky for the vanguard and could wipe out the leadership in a very short period of time by presenting a fixed target.

#56
that piece is pretty bad, it doesnt really discuss any of the whys or hows of the failures it mentions, which is pretty important for describing revolutionary strategies. like for example the greek civil war, yes greece after ww2 was pretty rural but also its pretty much impossible to have any real strategic depth in greece like you can in china or wherever. whoever has athens has greece pretty much.

additionally im not sure you can be so cut and dried about this stuff. if the reds had lost the russian civil war, wouldnt we consider the civil war much more part of the revolutionary process? And so on./
#57
I agree with p much everything you said Jools, however acknowledging that these events even occurred is a huge step forward compared to 99% of western marxists.

for example, i'm fascinated with the history of malaysian communism and why it failed. It's one of the most important examples of the interaction between race and class and how a communist party can succeed in highly racially segregated conditions. I know next to nothing, just what i picked up from like 2 weeks spent there and then reading a bit afterwards. but you'll find very few marxists in the west who even know malaysian communism was a thing. either you'll get complete ignorance or the typical "stalinist state capitalist peasants buzzwords".

yeah they just say "people's war failed in malaysia" which doesn't really say anything. but they are treating this as a historical and scientific question, which is a start. it's better than an obsession with the exact words of marx and lenin and which quote of theirs supports which position.
#58
i guess i just have really low standards, since I'm used to "the only method of revolution is the spontaneous world revolution of the industrial proletariat", "we have to live the society we want to become", "every revolution failed since the russian revolution cause they didn't follow lenin closely enough", "all social justice movements are part of the communist struggle", "the revolution can only happen in the most industrialized countries, third world revolutions dont count", and/or every other shitty excuse for first world leftism. the op article was refreshing for me.

Edited by babyhueypnewton ()

#59
ya no youre right too. i wonder how much of this is maoism and how much of this is signalfires... unique ideological journey meaning they can take a sort of broader view of this
#60
btw pretty funny they dont mention peru as a failure, those guys should really, heh, get off the PCP
#61
there's a relatively new book out that praises FARC-EP and basically says everything the media tells you about it is a lie. which made me sort of laugh but part of me thinks it's probably a good book because everything the media tells me about most things is a lie.
#62
whats it called
#63
http://www.amazon.ca/Revolutionary-Social-Change-Colombia-Direction/dp/074532875X/
#64
i think this is the article that i first learned about that book from http://marxistleninist.wordpress.com/2010/11/30/is-the-farc-ep-really-a-terrorist-organization/
#65

getfiscal posted:

there's a relatively new book out that praises FARC-EP and basically says everything the media tells you about it is a lie. which made me sort of laugh but part of me thinks it's probably a good book because everything the media tells me about most things is a lie.



when the media tells you to shower regularly it might have a point tho. just a thought

#66

deadken posted:

when the media tells you to shower regularly it might have a point tho. just a thought

i'm not going to be another dupe of big soap.

#67
chomsky had a lecture about the drug war and he said that that the whole idea that FARC was in the drug trade was a myth and that in reality they only taxed and regulated the drug trade that happened within their sovereign territory. which like i dunno man... like was that the argument that was going to recall the black helicopters.
#68

getfiscal posted:

there's a relatively new book out that praises FARC-EP and basically says everything the media tells you about it is a lie. which made me sort of laugh but part of me thinks it's probably a good book because everything the media tells me about most things is a lie.

ive been saying for years that the FARC is the best and nobody believes me

#69
FARC is good. its not news its FARC, what i always say. I also always say FARC off. So what do you want from me?
#70
Drew Cortez's FARC.com
#71

Crow posted:

FARC is good. its not news its FARC, what i always say. I also always say FARC off. So what do you want from me?




#72

getfiscal posted:

http://www.amazon.ca/Revolutionary-Social-Change-Colombia-Direction/dp/074532875X/


http://www.mediafire.com/view/?mbdcvjylhjidddu heres a pdf yall :-)

#73

babyhueypnewton posted:

for example, i'm fascinated with the history of malaysian communism and why it failed. It's one of the most important examples of the interaction between race and class and how a communist party can succeed in highly racially segregated conditions. I know next to nothing, just what i picked up from like 2 weeks spent there and then reading a bit afterwards. but you'll find very few marxists in the west who even know malaysian communism was a thing. either you'll get complete ignorance or the typical "stalinist state capitalist peasants buzzwords".


do you know of any good books on this?

#74
[account deactivated]
#75
[account deactivated]
#76
[account deactivated]
#77
subscribe to my trot anti-revisionist podcast

Edited by angelbutt_dollface ()

#78

Ironicwarcriminal posted:

Impper posted:

me and my friends kind of accidentally ran up to doing it because of the liberal horror at the guy

Some friend of a friend of a friend jokester at a party the other night thought he was being real irreverent by riling up some girls (my friends) about how hunting was natural and I’m like “yeah, it’s kinda just like that circle of life song by Elton john” and he’s like “EXACTLY” and then I’m like “or that school in Connecticut last month” and he got like super offended and looked around at people genuinely sort of scoffing like “can you believe that” and my friends are just like yeah whatever that’s iwc

And then everybody sat down and smoked

Thanks, I’ll be here all week try the veal

dude don't fuck with me irl please. Be chill.

#79

d4ky posted:

babyhueypnewton posted:for example, i'm fascinated with the history of malaysian communism and why it failed. It's one of the most important examples of the interaction between race and class and how a communist party can succeed in highly racially segregated conditions. I know next to nothing, just what i picked up from like 2 weeks spent there and then reading a bit afterwards. but you'll find very few marxists in the west who even know malaysian communism was a thing. either you'll get complete ignorance or the typical "stalinist state capitalist peasants buzzwords".

do you know of any good books on this?


Someone in the what are you reading thread here recommended The Jungle Is Neutral, which is an amazing first-hand account of the conditions of WWII Malaysia. He actually went native with communist guerillas who at the time were instrumental in fighting the Japanese (he was one of like 6 British citizens left in country after they had to quickly evacuate when the Japanese took the Malay Peninsula). Later the same Communists, though sponsored to give back their guns, were successfully fended off by the British cutting off their support by the villagers. This is literally where Hearts & Minds comes from because it was studied as one of the first successful counter-insurgencies (and first insurgencies).

It doesn't cover the postwar period very much and the worldview is obviously pro-British-imperialism, but that makes it easier to see the ideology actually. There are probably detailed military books about the resistance itself... but this provides the backstory and also is fun as hell to read.

#80