#161
im in love but she always snores. shes snoring right now.. sometimes i just want to set down my macbook pro, pick up this pillow, and just holdit over her face till the snoring stops so i can post in peace. so i can do my FUCKING job and moderate this forum without getting distracted
#162

tpaine posted:

genesee? if it is, yes. if not, save it for a sober day



of course genesee

#163

Agnus_Dei posted:



That moved me on a deep level.

#164
tpaine what would they say if u dug u up and made soup out of your bones?
#165
[account deactivated]
#166

tpaine posted:

EmanuelaOrlandi posted:

tpaine posted:

genesee? if it is, yes. if not, save it for a sober day

of course genesee

if you have genesee and you don't drink it i think something bad will happen. thats my rule of thumb *looks down at thumb stub from when he got too drunk on genesee and did something stupid...now THAT is a paradox fuckers!*



I'm too young to drink.

#167
i think the best song on california is none of them knew
#168
[account deactivated]
#169
[account deactivated]
#170
best song bungle period? nicotnia
#171

EmanuelaOrlandi posted:

best song bungle period? nicotnia



>> Barnaby Mogglecocke - Wed, 28 Nov 2012 02:59:02 EST ID:6M30XpFg No.274313 Ignore Report Quick Reply >>274308

Solar panels do not last forever. The 3 trillion is not a one-time fee. I'm also curious about where you got that number.
>> David Worthingbury - Wed, 28 Nov 2012 03:02:31 EST ID:/hkf27mr No.274314 Ignore Report Quick Reply >Solar panels do not last forever. The 3 trillion is not a one-time fee. I'm also curious about where you got that number.


Fine, $30 trillion. Still cheaper than destroying the ozone layer.
>> Barnaby Mogglecocke - Wed, 28 Nov 2012 03:12:08 EST ID:6M30XpFg No.274315 Ignore Report Quick Reply >>274314

But how are you actually going to carry that out? Problem with that is supply and demand. What you're suggesting far outstrips the ability of the solar panel industry to create panels. Prices would be extraordinarily high since there literally would not be enough panels until the industry has time to ramp up production dozens if not hundreds of times above current levels. They would have to build many, many factories, which is not a quick, easy, or inexpensive thing to do.

#172
[account deactivated]
#173
the vast majority of americans do not care one way or the other about communism or stalin or cold war era propaganda. in fact, the fundamental character trait of americans is lack of caring about politics at all.

americans, more than anything, are shocked by someone who cares a whole lot about something like communism (or anything really), and there is a certain reverence for someone willing to hold radical beliefs in our post-modern, de-politicized age. that trots feel the first thing to come out of there mouths is apoligism for stalin, defense of pure socialism against slander and the dirt of real history, and weaksauce social democracy so the audence doesn't get "scared off" has more to do with the trot brain and the inherent cowardice and stunted mental development (or as Mao would call it: liberalism) than any concern for the audience.

if you're concerned about a petit-bourgeois audience who will argue history and economics with you, well that reveals your class position as I would expect. hope this helps.
#174

babyhueypnewton posted:

the vast majority of americans do not care one way or the other about communism or stalin or cold war era propaganda. in fact, the fundamental character trait of americans is lack of caring about politics at all.

americans, more than anything, are shocked by someone who cares a whole lot about something like communism (or anything really), and there is a certain reverence for someone willing to hold radical beliefs in our post-modern, de-politicized age. that trots feel the first thing to come out of there mouths is apoligism for stalin, defense of pure socialism against slander and the dirt of real history, and weaksauce social democracy so the audence doesn't get "scared off" has more to do with the trot brain and the inherent cowardice and stunted mental development (or as Mao would call it: liberalism) than any concern for the audience.

if you're concerned about a petit-bourgeois audience who will argue history and economics with you, well that reveals your class position as I would expect. hope this helps.



It does. It does.

But why is there mao but not stalin?

#175
Top Queries from Search Traffic

The top queries driving traffic to rhizzone.net from search engines. Updated monthly.
Query Percent of Search Traffic
1 gilad atzmon 21.84%
2 library.nu links 18.43%
3 adam curtis poodles 2.99%
4 cyclonopedia cover 2.87%
5 the generalist. the enthusiastic productive type. 2.72%
6 twerter dm 2.28%
7 bio-hacks ben poppers 2.17%
8 plight of middle eastern christians 2.17%
9 mcrib 2012 1.98%
10 vilerat lf 1.89%
#176

VoxNihili posted:

Top Queries from Search Traffic

The top queries driving traffic to rhizzone.net from search engines. Updated monthly.
Query Percent of Search Traffic
1 gilad atzmon 21.84%
2 library.nu links 18.43%
3 adam curtis poodles 2.99%
4 cyclonopedia cover 2.87%
5 the generalist. the enthusiastic productive type. 2.72%
6 twerter dm 2.28%
7 bio-hacks ben poppers 2.17%
8 plight of middle eastern christians 2.17%
9 mcrib 2012 1.98%
10 vilerat lf 1.89%



You realize you're just astroturfing for McDonalds, right?

#177
anti-communism is a kind of althusserian "obviousness" in that it is never challenged or supported and proven true only by the definitions and terms inherent in the question.

this means it's very weak, even the slightest wind blows the house of cards over. most people have no investment in anti-communism, and those we should be targeting (hispanics especially) are already sympathetic. who cares what D&D or your bourgeois white friends think.

what america really needs is another 'big' bill haywood and not a bunch of cowards and effeminate liberals.
#178

babyhueypnewton posted:

anti-communism is a kind of althusserian "obviousness" in that it is never challenged or supported and proven true only by the definitions and terms inherent in the question.

this means it's very weak, even the slightest wind blows the house of cards over. most people have no investment in anti-communism, and those we should be targeting (hispanics especially) are already sympathetic. who cares what D&D or your bourgeois white friends think.

what america really needs is another 'big' bill haywood and not a bunch of cowards and effeminate liberals.



I know you don't mean it, but this is actually true.

#179
[account deactivated]
#180
here's a good read related to a lot of the topics we've discussed itt

http://pastehtml.com/view/cjuij9d30.rtxt
#181

mustang19 posted:

the ozone layer


nyoro~n

#182

mustang19 posted:

babyhueypnewton posted:

anti-communism is a kind of althusserian "obviousness" in that it is never challenged or supported and proven true only by the definitions and terms inherent in the question.

this means it's very weak, even the slightest wind blows the house of cards over. most people have no investment in anti-communism, and those we should be targeting (hispanics especially) are already sympathetic. who cares what D&D or your bourgeois white friends think.

what america really needs is another 'big' bill haywood and not a bunch of cowards and effeminate liberals.

I know you don't mean it, but this is actually true.



he actually does mean it

#183

VoxNihili posted:

mustang19 posted:

babyhueypnewton posted:

anti-communism is a kind of althusserian "obviousness" in that it is never challenged or supported and proven true only by the definitions and terms inherent in the question.

this means it's very weak, even the slightest wind blows the house of cards over. most people have no investment in anti-communism, and those we should be targeting (hispanics especially) are already sympathetic. who cares what D&D or your bourgeois white friends think.

what america really needs is another 'big' bill haywood and not a bunch of cowards and effeminate liberals.

I know you don't mean it, but this is actually true.

he actually does mean it



But he said it too eloquently in such a shitty thread.

#184
did that get shoved through google translate or somethin
#185

mustang19 posted:

VoxNihili posted:

mustang19 posted:

babyhueypnewton posted:

anti-communism is a kind of althusserian "obviousness" in that it is never challenged or supported and proven true only by the definitions and terms inherent in the question.

this means it's very weak, even the slightest wind blows the house of cards over. most people have no investment in anti-communism, and those we should be targeting (hispanics especially) are already sympathetic. who cares what D&D or your bourgeois white friends think.

what america really needs is another 'big' bill haywood and not a bunch of cowards and effeminate liberals.

I know you don't mean it, but this is actually true.

he actually does mean it

But he said it too eloquently in such a shitty thread.



man you are a wreck

#186
no
#187

Crow posted:

man you are a wreck



Five pages in one day. Yeah.

#188

mustang19 posted:

babyhueypnewton posted:

the vast majority of americans do not care one way or the other about communism or stalin or cold war era propaganda. in fact, the fundamental character trait of americans is lack of caring about politics at all.

americans, more than anything, are shocked by someone who cares a whole lot about something like communism (or anything really), and there is a certain reverence for someone willing to hold radical beliefs in our post-modern, de-politicized age. that trots feel the first thing to come out of there mouths is apoligism for stalin, defense of pure socialism against slander and the dirt of real history, and weaksauce social democracy so the audence doesn't get "scared off" has more to do with the trot brain and the inherent cowardice and stunted mental development (or as Mao would call it: liberalism) than any concern for the audience.

if you're concerned about a petit-bourgeois audience who will argue history and economics with you, well that reveals your class position as I would expect. hope this helps.

It does. It does.

But why is there mao but not stalin?



i think it's an interesting question why anti-mao propaganda never stuck the way anti-stalin propaganda did in the west. also interesting that mao is considered a person of color but stalin (the georgian) is not.

#189
Enough of this shit



Tulsa OK 1921: US Government Bombs US City





National Guard troops patrolling the streets armed. Thousands of black people held in a convention center. Hundreds of black dead, with bodies piled like wood. That was not New Orleans, that was Tulsa, Oklahoma, in June 1921.

On May 30, 1921 a young black man named Dick Rowland, stumbled into a white woman, while entering an elevator. He was accused of assault, and arrested the next day. Newly rich from oil Tulsa, was a Ku Klux Klan town. Rowland was sentenced to be hanged. The Tulsa Tribune called for a “Negro lynching tonight.”

The white mob was surprised when they were met by several dozen armed black men, dressed in their World War I uniforms. This led to a racist three day destruction of the black neighborhood of Greenwood. The Red Cross reported 300 mostly dead black people.

Greenwood called “Little Africa,” was a relatively wealthy community. White mobs, many deputized, destroyed every house, store, church or school. The mob met resistance from an armed black population. Governor Robertson declared martial law. The National Guard arrived with machine gun mounted trucks, and airplanes hovering over Greenwood. It was the first time an American city was bombed from the air, by the US government.

Over 6,000 black people, were round up and held in the convention center and fairgrounds, as long as eight days. The homeless were shuttled into a tent city, where typhoid and malnutrition took over. Blacks were allowed out of the convention center, with a tag, with an employers name. Thosands fled the city.

Attempts to turn Greenwood into an industrial zone were unsuccessful. For several years, it was deprived of paved streets, running water, and garbage collection.
#190

babyhueypnewton posted:

i think it's an interesting question why anti-mao propaganda never stuck the way anti-stalin propaganda did in the west. also interesting that mao is considered a person of color but stalin (the georgian) is not.



because georgians arent people. next challenger??

#191

babyhueypnewton posted:

mustang19 posted:

babyhueypnewton posted:

the vast majority of americans do not care one way or the other about communism or stalin or cold war era propaganda. in fact, the fundamental character trait of americans is lack of caring about politics at all.

americans, more than anything, are shocked by someone who cares a whole lot about something like communism (or anything really), and there is a certain reverence for someone willing to hold radical beliefs in our post-modern, de-politicized age. that trots feel the first thing to come out of there mouths is apoligism for stalin, defense of pure socialism against slander and the dirt of real history, and weaksauce social democracy so the audence doesn't get "scared off" has more to do with the trot brain and the inherent cowardice and stunted mental development (or as Mao would call it: liberalism) than any concern for the audience.

if you're concerned about a petit-bourgeois audience who will argue history and economics with you, well that reveals your class position as I would expect. hope this helps.

It does. It does.

But why is there mao but not stalin?

i think it's an interesting question why anti-mao propaganda never stuck the way anti-stalin propaganda did in the west. also interesting that mao is considered a person of color but stalin (the georgian) is not.



remember mother shitting NIXON? even then, Mao is still supposed to have the highest all-time, irrational voodoo killcount according to Weird Wild & Wacky Western History

#192

babyhueypnewton posted:

i think it's an interesting question why anti-mao propaganda never stuck the way anti-stalin propaganda did in the west. also interesting that mao is considered a person of color but stalin (the georgian) is not.



It did. Ever go to sunday school?

Mao was our "ally" against the USSR though.

#193
[account deactivated]
#194
lol why would a georgian be considered a person of color? first of all theyre slavs, who aren't people. second they're militant kafirs, so they're white as fuck. case closed.
#195
Enjoy your stay in ifap
#196

EmanuelaOrlandi posted:

lol why would a georgian be considered a person of color? first of all theyre slavs, who aren't people. second they're militant kafirs, so they're white as fuck. case closed.



Isn't posting here against your faith?

#197

mustang19 posted:

EmanuelaOrlandi posted:

lol why would a georgian be considered a person of color? first of all theyre slavs, who aren't people. second they're militant kafirs, so they're white as fuck. case closed.

Isn't posting here against your faith?

he doesnt have any, don't fall for it

#198
why would posting on a forum be against a faith? because it's bid'ah? dude im a white american in my 20s im not reverting to the stone age bc of my beliefs about god...
#199
i dunno when i talk to liberals they're unequivocally anti-stalin and talk about the millions of people he killed with his pinky, but when you mention mao it's like mentioning jon brown to a pacifist or mentioning eugene debs to a democrat. they get awkward, like the horizon of their ideology is apporaching and they're about to fall off and look like a fool/racist/conservative.

then again i went to hebrew school as a kid which was like a little kibbutz lol
#200

Crow posted:

mustang19 posted:

EmanuelaOrlandi posted:

lol why would a georgian be considered a person of color? first of all theyre slavs, who aren't people. second they're militant kafirs, so they're white as fuck. case closed.

Isn't posting here against your faith?

he doesnt have any, don't fall for it





That's bad. Stalin was a christian.