shennong posted:Lessons posted:
i also have to suspect this isn't some unique event distinct from every other famine in history, where the environmental factors were at most the precondition and the whole episode would have been entirely avoidable given an equitable distribution system. what's the point of an environmental critique completely divorced from a larger societal critiqueyeah dude, why didn't they just hang a banner with a 5000 word manifesto explicating the interactions between late capitalism, agroecology, and climate?
no instead they should hang a banner that says something both incorrect and convincing to no one who wasn't already on board
shennong posted:
solidarity with third world peasants in areas of concern to them - shrill! 350 thousand excess deaths/year in third world economies - basically nothing! so this.. this is marxism
it is a shame. so many of those deaths could be prevented if they had access to the same cheap and abundanant energy that we enjoy
shennong posted:
solidarity with third world peasants in areas of concern to them - shrill! 350 thousand excess deaths/year in third world economies - basically nothing! so this.. this is marxism
if that banner had said 'capitalism' or 'imperialism' rather than 'global warming' it would have been equally shrill bumper-sticker sloganeering and also equally ineffectual
shennong posted:
solidarity with third world peasants in areas of concern to them - shrill! 350 thousand excess deaths/year in third world economies - basically nothing! so this.. this is marxism
the statistic provided was actually simply a vague "350,000 died from climate change", there was no reference to location or economy, or anyhting else.
TG posted:
imagine if we changed our behavior and started burning less fossil fuel and consuming less in general and recycling and all that but the climate kept changing and there were famines and sea levels rising and hurricanes and blizzards and floods and locusts and shit anyway. we would have curbed our appetites for consumption for nothing and humanity's last few decades on earth wouldnt be filled with hedonism and gluttony and waste. what a horrible fate
communism equals soviet power plus electrification, not pedal power plus windmills
TG posted:
imagine if we changed our behavior and started burning less fossil fuel and consuming less in general and recycling and all that but the climate kept changing and there were famines and sea levels rising and hurricanes and blizzards and floods and locusts and shit anyway. we would have curbed our appetites for consumption for nothing and humanity's last few decades on earth wouldnt be filled with hedonism and gluttony and waste. what a horrible fate
there is quite the difference between condemning international regimes that seek to keep poor countries at their status quo and what you're describing
Lessons posted:shennong posted:
solidarity with third world peasants in areas of concern to them - shrill! 350 thousand excess deaths/year in third world economies - basically nothing! so this.. this is marxismif that banner had said 'capitalism' or 'imperialism' rather than 'global warming' it would have been equally shrill bumper-sticker sloganeering and also equally ineffectual
the banner isn't the point you sociopath
shennong posted:
you sociopath
speaking of shrill melodrama,
shennong posted:
solidarity with third world peasants in areas of concern to them - shrill! 350 thousand excess deaths/year in third world economies - basically nothing! so this.. this is marxism
excess deaths seems like a peculiar concept
Ironicwarcriminal posted:
It's amazing how people on the progressive left can accurately see how fearmongering is profitable when it's the MIC, but put their blinders on when it comes to this.
what is "this" you disingenuous idiot?
Lessons posted:
i also have to suspect this isn't some unique event distinct from every other famine in history, where the environmental factors were at most the precondition and the whole episode would have been entirely avoidable given an equitable distribution system. what's the point of an environmental critique completely divorced from a larger societal critique
Communism: the political system that causes prevents famines
AmericanNazbro posted:Ironicwarcriminal posted:
It's amazing how people on the progressive left can accurately see how fearmongering is profitable when it's the MIC, but put their blinders on when it comes to this.what is "this" you disingenuous idiot?
scientists, governments, bureaucracies, universities, ngos
there's a lot of money in fear
babyfinland posted:
hahaha can you imagine what a marxist dictatorship would do in the face of this crisis hahaha lordy lord
"i don't know how marxists will solve the global warming crisis, but the subsequent crisis will be fought with sticks and stones" - albert einstein
babyfinland posted:Lessons posted:
i also have to suspect this isn't some unique event distinct from every other famine in history, where the environmental factors were at most the precondition and the whole episode would have been entirely avoidable given an equitable distribution system. what's the point of an environmental critique completely divorced from a larger societal critiqueCommunism: the political system that
causesprevents famines
actually i believe you'll find all those famines were caused by droughts and other environmental factors, not economics and politics
-cashes check
-dives into pool of money like scrooge mcduck
Lessons posted:babyfinland posted:Lessons posted:
i also have to suspect this isn't some unique event distinct from every other famine in history, where the environmental factors were at most the precondition and the whole episode would have been entirely avoidable given an equitable distribution system. what's the point of an environmental critique completely divorced from a larger societal critiqueCommunism: the political system that
causesprevents faminesactually i believe you'll find all those famines were caused by droughts and other environmental factors, not economics and politics
another great slogan for a banner. keep those juices flowin guys
babyfinland posted:
*writes IF U HAD SOCIALISMZ THIS WUD NOT HAPPEN DERP on a sign, puts on a stormtrooper helmet*
that's true, socialists don't offer any clear solutions, which puts them about on par with everyone else including the green movement
getfiscal posted:
ecosocialists believe there is a lot of evidence for global warming, but they also take a look at actually existing socialism and think "not too bad"
Ironicwarcriminal posted:
It's amazing how people on the progressive left can accurately see how fearmongering is profitable when it's the MIC, but put their blinders on when it comes to this.
if there is profit to be made it is by hydrocarbon companies, which we do see try continually try to fund studies to disprove climate change
- pj orourke lol
Goethestein posted:Ironicwarcriminal posted:
It's amazing how people on the progressive left can accurately see how fearmongering is profitable when it's the MIC, but put their blinders on when it comes to this.if there is profit to be made it is by hydrocarbon companies, which we do see try continually try to fund studies to disprove climate change
there is profit in food too but that doesn't mean that potatoes aren't delicious
Lessons posted:babyfinland posted:Lessons posted:
i also have to suspect this isn't some unique event distinct from every other famine in history, where the environmental factors were at most the precondition and the whole episode would have been entirely avoidable given an equitable distribution system. what's the point of an environmental critique completely divorced from a larger societal critiqueCommunism: the political system that
causesprevents faminesactually i believe you'll find all those famines were caused by droughts and other environmental factors, not economics and politics
what about mao
-starting a campaign to kill all the vermin-eating sparrows
-deciding it would be a super keen idea to plant crops twice as close together
-shipping experienced farm labor into cities to work
-putting quotas for iron production on farmers, causing them to need to smelt their tools into shitty pig iron
-creating a climate of ideology and fear that kept people from addressing the problem when it was minor
-refusing food aid
Goethestein posted:Lessons posted:babyfinland posted:Lessons posted:
i also have to suspect this isn't some unique event distinct from every other famine in history, where the environmental factors were at most the precondition and the whole episode would have been entirely avoidable given an equitable distribution system. what's the point of an environmental critique completely divorced from a larger societal critiqueCommunism: the political system that
causesprevents faminesactually i believe you'll find all those famines were caused by droughts and other environmental factors, not economics and politics
what about mao
-starting a campaign to kill all the vermin-eating sparrows
-deciding it would be a super keen idea to plant crops twice as close together
-shipping experienced farm labor into cities to work
-putting quotas for iron production on farmers, causing them to need to smelt their tools into shitty pig iron
-creating a climate of ideology and fear that kept people from addressing the problem when it was minor
-refusing food aid
otoh have you considered that everything was fabricated by western historians. food 4 thought (I have no other kind of food)
also sideline steel production in villages was one of the leading sectors of growth in the early deng reform area, so it wasn't like farmers couldn't do it. the problem is that they provided the wrong sort of incentives.
Ironicwarcriminal posted:
"If the Perennially Indignant think pollution is the fault only of Reaganites wallowing in capitalist greed, then they should go take a deep breath in Smolensk or a long drink from the river Volga."
- pj orourke lol
that's true. although under True Socialism all problems we understand today will vanish