blinkandwheeze posted:
naw the things negarestani talks about are generally pretty serious issues - the particular group of london based philosophers he associates with are all nerds who grew up listening to jungle & reggae soundsystems tho so their thinking is marked by that sometimes. there are a lot of traces of john carpenter movies & things like that in cyclonopedia tho, if that's an issue with you i guess
i am definitely a nerd abt music, but i dont trust a philosopher to have an opinion about music that is worth reading. reggae sucks, as well -- dub is the thinking man's reggae.
Skylark posted:
i am definitely a nerd abt music, but i dont trust a philosopher to have an opinion about music that is worth reading. reggae sucks, as well -- dub is the thinking man's reggae.
well i mean to clarify the person i was talking about specifically is a musician first and a philosopher second, (and i was using reggae soundsystem culture as a catchall for the reggae/dub/ragga axis) but his connection to negarestani is mostly just a fairly close proximity so it shouldn't factor into your appreciation of cyclonopedia at all! read cyclonopedia yall
Skylark posted:
i am definitely a nerd abt music, but i dont trust a philosopher to have an opinion about music that is worth reading. reggae sucks, as well -- dub is the thinking man's reggae.
counterpoint: fucking reality, gawd daaamn!
EmanuelaOrlandi posted:
counterpoint: fucking reality, gawd daaamn!
ive seen this post a few times already, but cool.
aerdil posted:
antioedipus and a thousand plateaus is pretty necessary reading before tackling cyclonopedia imo. itd be pretty hopeless w/o knowing the basic concepts
i'd disagree, actually - cyclonopedia has been really warmly received not just by the philosophical community but by novelists, architects, graphic designers, filmmakers, etc. who don't necessarily have that background at all
Skylark posted:blinkandwheeze posted:
naw the things negarestani talks about are generally pretty serious issues - the particular group of london based philosophers he associates with are all nerds who grew up listening to jungle & reggae soundsystems tho so their thinking is marked by that sometimes. there are a lot of traces of john carpenter movies & things like that in cyclonopedia tho, if that's an issue with you i guessi am definitely a nerd abt music, but i dont trust a philosopher to have an opinion about music that is worth reading. reggae sucks, as well -- dub is the thinking man's reggae.
nietzsche wrote a lot about music
Skylark posted:
i was planning to read the book in the OP; can some1 pls confirm that this book is not as absurd as the idea mentioned in the post i just quoted, and is in fact worth setting aside what im currently reading.
Edit: Already copied it to my SMart Phone, so all labor beyond the reading itself is taken care of.
i guess you missed infinite cockjammer's epic post in the original LF wherein he gave a badiouian deconstruktion of dubstep
germanjoey posted:Skylark posted:
i was planning to read the book in the OP; can some1 pls confirm that this book is not as absurd as the idea mentioned in the post i just quoted, and is in fact worth setting aside what im currently reading.
Edit: Already copied it to my SMart Phone, so all labor beyond the reading itself is taken care of.i guess you missed infinite cockjammer's epic post in the original LF wherein he gave a badiouian deconstruktion of dubstep
and then like a day later it was nuked by admins due to an informal unstated "nuke dubstep posts" policy. good times.
& this is how i will worship, O Black one,
http://youtubedoubler.com/3eRR
shennong posted:
is the numerology important to understand? my eyes kind of glazed over in that part, it just felt like too much detail about a made up lovecraftian artefact, but i dunno if there was some significance to it i missed
no
shennong posted:
is the numerology important to understand? my eyes kind of glazed over in that part, it just felt like too much detail about a made up lovecraftian artefact, but i dunno if there was some significance to it i missed
i havent totally given up on it having some significance yet but it was definitely the biggest stumbling block i had the first time through. at this point if its a misreading to ignore it, its part of the lf-canonical misreading
loyellthecat22 posted:
i can't read it becasue german joe hasn't sent me his copy, on account of him being a fucktard
oh yeah. i forgot lol... I'll get "On the Case."
also, im gonna be in sf sunday-thursday - i could shrink-wrap it and toss it in your dumpster, if thats easier for u...
i'm really ignorant of the discourse around this subject, but is anyone familiar with gold's deep hot biosphere? is it to be taken as seriously as cyclonopedia seems to want us to?
blinkandwheeze posted:
glad to have you on board!
i'm really ignorant of the discourse around this subject, but is anyone familiar with gold's deep hot biosphere? is it to be taken as seriously as cyclonopedia seems to want us to?
it's widely regarded as pseudoscience, there's no empirical evidence for abiogenesis of oil, gold probably stole the idea from soviet scientists who were writing 4 decades before him, and its mostly promulgated by oil industry flacks. even if gold is correct, production data indicates that the genesis process is too slow to have any effect on fields on human timescales so its kind of irrelevant
blinkandwheeze posted:
glad to have you on board!
i'm really ignorant of the discourse around this subject, but is anyone familiar with gold's deep hot biosphere? is it to be taken as seriously as cyclonopedia seems to want us to?
this came up on old lf (mistersix, i think?) and iirc we concluded that the point was the image rather than the fact of the theory
NEOADMINISTRATOR posted:
oh yeah. i forgot lol... I'll get "On the Case."
also, im gonna be in sf sunday-thursday - i could shrink-wrap it and toss it in your dumpster, if thats easier for u...
my "graduate school" (so-called) is in los angeles so you'd have to throw it into a dumpster in los angeles