roseweird posted:stop posting about porn dumbass
this isn't "about" porn. it's about Science.
swampman posted:The corpus spongiosum, the part of the penis that makes up most of the shaft and provides erectile function, is a porous tissue. By design, the overall tissue density increases when the spongiosum fills with blood during sexual arousal (or artificially by a saline solution, for example). As more blood enters the tissue, the penis become erect and hardens. So yeah, it could refer specifically to the mass per unit volume of the person's penis. But more likely, they are using "massive" in more of a metaphorical way, to imply that the penis is capable of seriously hurting the women it's about to rape.
Nice erasure of queer men.
Cuntessa_Markievicz posted:look as a female i would appreciate more men that would brutally castrate themselves. lobbing your dick off would be the ultimate act of masculinity that would help end masculinity as well.
what if the resulting impact of a sufficiently massive cock hitting the earth caused a nuclear winter event. i bet you'd feel pretty silly then.
le_nelson_mandela_face posted:Cuntessa_Markievicz posted:look as a female i would appreciate more men that would brutally castrate themselves. lobbing your dick off would be the ultimate act of masculinity that would help end masculinity as well.
what if the resulting impact of a sufficiently massive cock hitting the earth caused a nuclear winter event. i bet you'd feel pretty silly then.
id rather not die due to chronic masculinity and would prefer natural disaster
Cuntessa_Markievicz posted:look as a female i would appreciate more men that would brutally castrate themselves. lobbing your dick off would be the ultimate act of masculinity that would help end masculinity as well.
as someone who has assisted in hundreds of castrations i should point out that it refers to the removal of the testicles, with or without removal of the scrotum. so, yeah, um,
c_man posted:"massive" could also mean extremely large size but very low density, like a balloon the size of a large dog
In order for a balloon to have significant mass, it would have to be larger than a dog. But I like the way you think.
le_nelson_mandela_face posted:penises are definitely the least gross genitals. evidence: blood and people dont come out of them
When they take a boxcutter to you make sure and embrace the opportunity for biology lesson
le_nelson_mandela_face posted:c_man posted:"massive" could also mean extremely large size but very low density, like a balloon the size of a large dog
In order for a balloon to have significant mass, it would have to be larger than a dog. But I like the way you think.
Wow this is so wrong. Read a book. Ever heard of a lead balloon??
swampman posted:le_nelson_mandela_face posted:penises are definitely the least gross genitals. evidence: blood and people dont come out of them
When they take a boxcutter to you make sure and embrace the opportunity for biology lesson