#1
Are you going to cripple the growth of your site just because of one idiot? And reluctance to set up a greeting forum?

Edited by Lucille ()

#2
why don't you troll your way out of IFAP. GF is a pretty lenient guy.
#3
You should stop.posting so many terrible threads imho
#4
i tried to create a gimmick account named The_New_Yorker that was only going to respond to threads by posting relevant cartoons from The New Yorker so i would like to personally thank the mods for saving me from myself
#5

le_nelson_mandela_face posted:

You should stop.posting so many terrible threads imho



Nananana I like it.

#6

Lucille posted:

Are you going to cripple the growth of your site just because of one idiot? And reluctance to set up a greeting forum?

growth is a capitalist ideal

#7
#8
Also the original Marxists thought communism was supposed to increase economic growth. The only reason the left thinks the opposite is because its been hijacked by degenerate hippies who respond to the failure of socialism by changing their epistemology and ethics.
#9
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sustainability
#10
That's another example of the left inverting its original principles (anti-malthusianism).
#11
conscious population control is probably a better choice than the alternative.
#12

conscious population control is probably a better choice than the alternative.



Agreed.

I actually agree with the Rhizzonecult on a lot of things, I just think it's hilarious that it thinks its doing something radical and disruptive when all we're doing is advancing the leftist agenda programmed into us by powerful Jewish media elites.

Edited by Lucille ()

#13

Lucille posted:

conscious population control is probably a better choice than the alternative.

Agreed.

I actually agree with the Rhizzonecult on a lot of things, I just think it's hilarious that it thinks its doing something radical and disruptive when all we're doing is advancing the leftist agenda programmed into us by powerful Jewish media elites.


it doesn't though. the most radical thing that's happened is discipline's 1 woman gentrification plan and tpaine crippling the morale of the labor pools he's in. also a moderator of a for-pay comedy forum died and he got made fun of here. and i guess making sure the secret service gets to keep its travel budget whenever there is a threat against the president.

#14
I didn't say it does radical things, only that it thinks it is.

Or maybe it doesn't, I dunno.

I'm sorry I haven't been posting as much as I used to, I've occupied myself with getting Mises.org fired up about evicting Chinese peasants.

http://libertyhq.freeforums.org/what-s-up-with-b-ics-brazil-india-china-south-africa-t1059.html
#15
No need to apologize, 'stang.
#16
no one who posts here actually thinks the rhizzone is a catalyst for change. this is an echochamber for eco-stalinist white supremacist Far right radical atheist muslims. And we (don't) vote.
#17
I overgeneralize about Rhizzone but it's still very satisfying to talk with people like Jools and daddyholes about the marxist position on immigration etc.
#18

Lucille posted:

I'm sorry I haven't been posting as much as I used to, I've occupied myself with getting Mises.org fired up about evicting Chinese peasants.

http://libertyhq.freeforums.org/what-s-up-with-b-ics-brazil-india-china-south-africa-t1059.html

hows all that going?

Edited by Chthonic_Goat_666 ()

#19
You took my avatar you son of a bitch.
#20

I don't adhere to natural law (well, actually I do, but from it's first principles per sé), and natural law isn't necessary for homesteading to be a superior objectively discernable manner of property acquisition, as compared to mere decree. But to answer your question: It is indeed true that almost every piece of land currently owned was obtainted in some point of history by the initiation of force. Either by the state, or private individuals. Now many statist argue that this fact invalidates the libertarian claim that contemporary individuals can have a legitimate private property title upon their land, as it was in high probability originally stolen. But this claim is absurd, the burden of proof lies upon the individual(s) asserting that they have a superior property claim upon the lands currently possessed by another individual. Rothbard sums it up very nicely in his chapter about property and criminality:

#21
http://libertyhq.freeforums.org/for-once-a-victory-for-liberty-t1068.html

Be more subtle.

Edited by Lucille ()

#22

1) This is not a case of property being reclaimed. She did not (and, according to most libertarians *could not have*) sold herself to him.



She was selling a service, not 'herself'.

#23
The property being reclaimed is the money, the woman was just trying to steal it like a common thief, and in such a situation its perfectly rational that a man would shoot her to reclaim that money. Not sure how this is a problem for libertarians.
#24
I don't think my posts will make very good trolls, mustang
#25
Be more subtle.
#26
#27

what does this forum need



More Mustang posts.

BTW unbanning my mustang account would make no difference, I would still avoid LF so as not expose my few remaining accounts with good names.

Re-enabling account creation is basically the same as unbanning mustang, otherwise I'll just keep baiting faily with transgendered alts.

Edited by Lucille ()

#28
#29

Want to get out of IFAP? Here's your shot



lol I'm not getting arrested. You already tried death threats to the president.

#30
Brownstein was outed as bisexual to her family and the world by Spin when she was 21 years old. The article discussed the fact that she had dated band mate Corin Tucker in the beginning of Sleater-Kinney (the song "One More Hour" is about their breakup). After the article was out, she said, "I hadn't seen it , and I got a phone call. My dad called me and was like, 'The Spin article's out. Um, do you want to let me know what's going on?' The ground was pulled out from underneath me... My dad did not know that Corin and I had ever dated, or that I even dated girls." In 2006, The New York Times described Brownstein as "openly gay." In a November 3, 2010 cover-story for Portland, Oregon's Willamette Week, Brownstein laid to rest questions about her sexual identity: "It’s weird, because no one’s actually ever asked me. People just always assume, like, you’re this or that. It’s like, ‘OK. I’m bisexual." In 2012, Brownstein told interviewer Marc Maron that no one in Sleater-Kinney was gay, and that when she and Tucker had dated it was for "a second."
Since working together on ThunderAnt, Brownstein and Armisen developed what Brownstein has called "one of the most intimate, fun­ctional, romantic, but nonsexual relationships ever had"; According to Armisen, their relationship is "all of the things that I’ve ever wanted, you know, aside from like the physical stuff, but the intimacy that I have with her is like no other."



the desperation

Edited by Lucille ()

#31
Yeah but that was the chilean anime menace. How about representing the red white and blue mustang. Let your eagles soar. Get arrested and post pictures of the steampunk criminal procedure
#32
I could go around posting steampunk wedding pics on nerd sites and overwhelm Rhizzone with weeaboos. But they can't register, so whats the point?
#33

According to Armisen, their relationship is "all of the things that I’ve ever wanted, you know, aside from like the physical stuff, but the intimacy that I have with her is like no other."



its called a friendship, Fred

#34


playing tambourines with your feet while drumming
#35

lobbying for polluters and US-friendly regimes is ethical but lobbying for a regime that undermined white supremacy is unethical.



But the first two are good things and the last one is bad.

#36
By the way keeping your country an underdeveloped authoritarian third world piece of shit reinforces white supremacy in the long run.
#37
how come black people get their own Sabbath but all we get is a Zombie? #freepaula
#38
http://youtubedoubler.com/?video1=iwNU8JDX1c0&start1=0&video2=Cwkej79U3ek&start2=20&authorName=taltigolt